tyfi's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 156118545 | over 1 year ago | Not every offshoot of a motorway needs to be primary. In this case, the loop on Militia Drive to Algoa Road is find at secondary. Honestly, even tertiary could work there. But the little northern bit of Militia Drive heading to the military/MSHP areas absolutely should not be primary. |
| 156116193 | over 1 year ago | See note/3153753 |
| 155583386 | over 1 year ago | ^ Argh. That last comment was not meant to go in this changeset discussion thread. I had one job :) |
| 155583386 | over 1 year ago | Every change made in this changeset was individually considered. |
| 155585903 | over 1 year ago | To be clear because it's not from what I've written above: Every change made in this changeset was individually considered. Without the code I would have made the same exact edits. |
| 155664589 | over 1 year ago | Every change made in this changeset was individually considered. |
| 155761469 | over 1 year ago | Need to check whether it's "La Tour" or "Latour"... |
| 155760855 | over 1 year ago | This adds the existing node to the relation with role "label". It doesn't affect rendering in any way. |
| 155756705 | over 1 year ago | Many many more CDPs in Missouri remain, but most of the remaining ones are mapped as points. This isn't wrong, but it would be cool to have the boundaries. That's a job for the future. Several CDPs are flat out missing, though, which is higher priority IMO. |
| 155756705 | over 1 year ago | I also changed roles on node members from admin_centre to label, and I made sure each relation had up to date Wikidata and Wikipedia tags (although the former is sufficient, the latter probably won't go out of date for CDP boundaries). |
| 155756705 | over 1 year ago | These were incorrectly imported as administrative boundaries despite not being administrative entities. The boundaries as mapped are census-designated places (CDPs) and are decided by Census Bureau and its partners as opposed to through annexations. |
| 155680883 | over 1 year ago | A mapper several months ago did a bunch of cleanup of mostly TIGER-imported names on Missouri state highways, and it looks like this name got added back incidentally in an update to road names in the local area. That update was made by a mapper who apparently did not know about the "name is only the name" convention (other proof being county reference numbers in parens; they also left many road names abbreviated) |
| 155716883 | over 1 year ago | Simply the fact that it's a state-owned road does not mean it should be upgraded. |
| 155716707 | over 1 year ago | The historic bridge wasn't even mapped. |
| 155673721 | over 1 year ago | Also funny is Webster County which applies the names "Long State Highway P"/"Short State Highway P" and "Long State Highway Y"/"Short State Highway Y" to segments of MO P and MO Y, respectively, when they're cut in half by north-south roads. |
| 155673721 | over 1 year ago | Ooh, a highway! My favorite has to be when the letter is mistaken for a directional suffix, e.g. "State Highway North". I even saw the letter O mistaken for a direction suffix in the TIGER import (what direction could that mean?) Sometimes they're mistakenly referred to as county roads, too (e.g. "N Cl N Highway"), which I bet hearkens back to the Takeover Program. Dunno for sure, though. I wish I could know the rationale behind some of these names. |
| 155677181 | over 1 year ago | ^ Y* |
| 155677084 | over 1 year ago | ^ Y* |
| 155677084 | over 1 year ago | This name is provided by the county, not the state, and is the official name used in physical land addresses. The road is still designated as P by the state, and that's what goes in the ref tag(s) and route relation(s). |
| 155677181 | over 1 year ago | This name is provided by the county, not the state, and is the official name used in physical land addresses. The road is still designated as P by the state, and that's what goes in the ref tag(s) and route relation(s). |