OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
139151310 over 2 years ago

The one number I corrected was on way #18627830. It had "name_2" tag claiming it was a continuation of PCR 616. I verified on Bing StreetSide (which remarkably has coverage here) that it's actually PCR 622.

139151310 over 2 years ago

Notice: The accuracy of these expanded names is 100% dependent on the accuracy of the original Pcr-initialism names. I did not reference any sources beyond imagery (to correct one incorrect road, which I'll mention next) to verify numbering.

139151310 over 2 years ago

I chose to use the "PCR X" form as the ref value for the ways. I think CR is more common nationwide, but PCR is more locally-appropriate. This is easy enough to change in the future. Similarly, I believe this is only an incremental improvement.

139151310 over 2 years ago

I should note that I couldn't determine whether PCR expands to "Perry County Road" or "Perry County Route", but picking one was a better thing than leaving abbreviations in the database.

139151310 over 2 years ago

Most of these roads had names of the format "Pcr X" where X is an integer. The "cr" letters were lowercase. These were carried over from the TIGER import.

139115570 over 2 years ago

This only affected U.S. Route 61 in Missouri.

139115570 over 2 years ago

Please let me know if this changed something wrongly. I am very confident it was only an improvement, as there were many gaps and a mix of forward/backward and north/south roles (I changed everything over to the latter).

139112426 over 2 years ago

This northbound piece of North Truman Boulevard was only in US 67 relation, but the opposing way was correctly in both US 67 and US 61 relations.

No sources cited because this is just in OSM.

139109801 over 2 years ago

Make that "six", and include O and M.

139109801 over 2 years ago

I also added is_in:county tags to relations for all four mentioned supplemental route relations.

139109801 over 2 years ago

Bounding box is large because I added layer=4 and layer=5 tags on two power lines crossing roads I touched.

139106265 over 2 years ago

Specifically added missing water bodies, smoothed some roads, added a tower crane, and added missing power towers (some of which were incorrectly tagged as poles and the rest untagged altogether).

139097958 over 2 years ago

Source: Bing Aerial Imagery; Esri Clarity; Bing StreetSide; MoDOT travelway definitions (via MSDIS Open Data Portal)

139063101 over 2 years ago

I also added some stop signs, and I smoothed some roads.

139063101 over 2 years ago

Bounding box is large because I unglued some power lines which have been glued since TIGER.

139014145 over 2 years ago

Latest imagery seems to show oxbow lakes formed in an area previously filled along Old River, as well, so I added those.

139013026 over 2 years ago

The shadow is visible in Esri Clarity, and I aligned Clarity to match Bing.

139010479 over 2 years ago

The pavement color changed at the exact same spot as the Arkansas welcome sign, so I used that as the transition between MO NN and AR 181. This does not line up perfectly with the TIGER line, but that's par for the course with TIGER imho.

139007978 over 2 years ago

Bounding box is large due to setting layer=5 on a power line.

138963745 over 2 years ago

^ Reason for this is because USGSHydroCached isn't precise about exactly where a named stretch ends, so I inferred that based on waterway connections. There likely isn't an issue.