tyfi's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 139151310 | over 2 years ago | The one number I corrected was on way #18627830. It had "name_2" tag claiming it was a continuation of PCR 616. I verified on Bing StreetSide (which remarkably has coverage here) that it's actually PCR 622. |
| 139151310 | over 2 years ago | Notice: The accuracy of these expanded names is 100% dependent on the accuracy of the original Pcr-initialism names. I did not reference any sources beyond imagery (to correct one incorrect road, which I'll mention next) to verify numbering. |
| 139151310 | over 2 years ago | I chose to use the "PCR X" form as the ref value for the ways. I think CR is more common nationwide, but PCR is more locally-appropriate. This is easy enough to change in the future. Similarly, I believe this is only an incremental improvement. |
| 139151310 | over 2 years ago | I should note that I couldn't determine whether PCR expands to "Perry County Road" or "Perry County Route", but picking one was a better thing than leaving abbreviations in the database. |
| 139151310 | over 2 years ago | Most of these roads had names of the format "Pcr X" where X is an integer. The "cr" letters were lowercase. These were carried over from the TIGER import. |
| 139115570 | over 2 years ago | This only affected U.S. Route 61 in Missouri. |
| 139115570 | over 2 years ago | Please let me know if this changed something wrongly. I am very confident it was only an improvement, as there were many gaps and a mix of forward/backward and north/south roles (I changed everything over to the latter). |
| 139112426 | over 2 years ago | This northbound piece of North Truman Boulevard was only in US 67 relation, but the opposing way was correctly in both US 67 and US 61 relations. No sources cited because this is just in OSM. |
| 139109801 | over 2 years ago | Make that "six", and include O and M. |
| 139109801 | over 2 years ago | I also added is_in:county tags to relations for all four mentioned supplemental route relations. |
| 139109801 | over 2 years ago | Bounding box is large because I added layer=4 and layer=5 tags on two power lines crossing roads I touched. |
| 139106265 | over 2 years ago | Specifically added missing water bodies, smoothed some roads, added a tower crane, and added missing power towers (some of which were incorrectly tagged as poles and the rest untagged altogether). |
| 139097958 | over 2 years ago | Source: Bing Aerial Imagery; Esri Clarity; Bing StreetSide; MoDOT travelway definitions (via MSDIS Open Data Portal) |
| 139063101 | over 2 years ago | I also added some stop signs, and I smoothed some roads. |
| 139063101 | over 2 years ago | Bounding box is large because I unglued some power lines which have been glued since TIGER. |
| 139014145 | over 2 years ago | Latest imagery seems to show oxbow lakes formed in an area previously filled along Old River, as well, so I added those. |
| 139013026 | over 2 years ago | The shadow is visible in Esri Clarity, and I aligned Clarity to match Bing. |
| 139010479 | over 2 years ago | The pavement color changed at the exact same spot as the Arkansas welcome sign, so I used that as the transition between MO NN and AR 181. This does not line up perfectly with the TIGER line, but that's par for the course with TIGER imho. |
| 139007978 | over 2 years ago | Bounding box is large due to setting layer=5 on a power line. |
| 138963745 | over 2 years ago | ^ Reason for this is because USGSHydroCached isn't precise about exactly where a named stretch ends, so I inferred that based on waterway connections. There likely isn't an issue. |