Thank you for bringing this to my attention, erickdeoliveiraleal. I’ve updated the alignment.

Hi erickdeoliveiraleal, thank you for letting me know.

Thanks for letting me know. Is there a community resource or public works page I should be watching when editing in this area?

source=Digital Globe

The source is Digital Globe not Maxar for these edits.

erantr1,

Thank you for your feedback, the source I used for this edit was actually 'Esri World Imagery' rather than Maxar my apologies for not adding the correct image source.

Thanks,
trigeo

Velox,

Thank you for your feedback regarding this changeset. I would have
used Mapillary to make the change which I can now see the relation should have been changed to "only_straight_on" which you have applied to node 4929457328.

Thanks,
trigeo

source: Maxar Premium

Adjusted geometry of existing way to match satellite imagery #Kaart 2020

Source for this edit was Digital Globe and not Maxar.

4004,
Thank you for the additional feedback.

If the practice in Belarus is to add links then I will follow that editing practice here. Thanks for the help

4004, Thanks for your feedback the way was changed from a link classification to match other major intersections in the area where the way continues through the intersection including way 195524708, way 285947258, way 150991614, way 288432188, way 158089144

4004,

Thanks for your feedback I have reverted the change to a link and added turn lanes as per the OSM wiki for link classified ways.

It could be, I can add construction=yes if that works, until we can know for sure it’s complete?

Hi Joseph E,

Thanks for your feedback, It seemed Bing imagery was showing evidence of a bridge and seemed to be newest available here.

Regards,
trigeo

Thank you for your feedback I will make the requested changes.

Readded name=Carrefour Ket Taï to ways

For the edits off Route de Rochambeau I was using Bing as an imagery reference rather than Mapbox. Also thank you for highlighting the BDOrtho IGN satellite imagery for French Guiana.

My apologies, I will make sure to do so next time.

The classification changes I made in the other changesets are currently being reviewed.