Hoppas att det är rätt nu.

Please revert your changes

And perhaps use Bing as a source

About name is not rendered.
Create two mulipolygons one for Inreträsket and one for Ytreträsket.
Remove the name from the way and add it to the multipolygon instead. The same for "natural: water" it shall be in the polygon not in the way

I think you change was incorrect. If so, fix it.

Please answer my question first of sources. Then I will answer your question. (You never answer questions of what type of sources you use.)

You did the change so I think it is better that you do it. Otherwise you are going to revert my changes.

I agree that it was correct mapped. But now is the highway marked as an construction. So I think the right change shall be remove the construction=tert

Why shall I not check official registers?
So you have been there and checked. So source is type "survey"?

Hej!
Kollar över addresse som jag får varningar på. Bl.a. Skårsgatan 65. Kollat i olika register men hittar inte attt denna adress finns. Vilken källa har du till denna?

Jag har kollat historien. Har du gjort det?
way/168170121/history

Hej!
Du hade gjort om Titteridammsvägen till "highway=construction". Ville bara kontrollera om det var korrekt. Jag undrar för den andra vägen är enkelriktad. Svårt för bussarna att komma in till Angered Centrum. Eller är det så att den andra vägen skall vara dubbleriktad? Hittar inte att den skall vara avstängd. Har du någon källa?

Using addr:country=*, addr:state=*, and addr:province=* are optional, since they can almost always be determined from boundary relations (if present and valid).
addr=*

I think this is a type of vandalism.

I do a mapping and you revert my change without telling what was incorrect of my change. Sometimes you can do a mapping in 2 different ways and both are correct. I gave a motivation and my change was not a change of what someone else has done. (I do not say I "own" my mapping, just telling I did a change of what I have added before). The answers I got from you are not understandable. If I change again will you revert it? Please do not revert without first check with the contributor.

And... why do you create changesets without telling why. There are a VERY lot of changesets with comment "Puts - adjustments" with source "Aggregate". It is very hard to understand what those changesets add for type of value more than just a changeset to your list of number of changesets that you have produced. Please, stop with this. Use Comments and Source in a meaningful way.

Still no answer. Is it allowed to use commas or not? How hard can it be to answer.