tomasy's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 54130294 | Hoppas att det är rätt nu. |
|
| 83415150 | Please revert your changes |
|
| 84516815 | And perhaps use Bing as a source |
|
| 84516815 | About name is not rendered.
|
|
| 83994594 | I think you change was incorrect. If so, fix it. |
|
| 80178708 | Please answer my question first of sources. Then I will answer your question. (You never answer questions of what type of sources you use.) |
|
| 83994594 | You did the change so I think it is better that you do it. Otherwise you are going to revert my changes. |
|
| 83994594 | I agree that it was correct mapped. But now is the highway marked as an construction. So I think the right change shall be remove the construction=tert |
|
| 80178708 | Why shall I not check official registers?
|
|
| 80178708 | Hej!
|
|
| 83994594 | Jag har kollat historien. Har du gjort det?
|
|
| 83994594 | Hej!
|
|
| 83698879 | Using addr:country=*, addr:state=*, and addr:province=* are optional, since they can almost always be determined from boundary relations (if present and valid).
|
|
| 83415156 | I think this is a type of vandalism. I do a mapping and you revert my change without telling what was incorrect of my change. Sometimes you can do a mapping in 2 different ways and both are correct. I gave a motivation and my change was not a change of what someone else has done. (I do not say I "own" my mapping, just telling I did a change of what I have added before). The answers I got from you are not understandable. If I change again will you revert it? Please do not revert without first check with the contributor. And... why do you create changesets without telling why. There are a VERY lot of changesets with comment "Puts - adjustments" with source "Aggregate". It is very hard to understand what those changesets add for type of value more than just a changeset to your list of number of changesets that you have produced. Please, stop with this. Use Comments and Source in a meaningful way. |
|
| 83415156 | Still no answer. Is it allowed to use commas or not? How hard can it be to answer. |
|
| 83415156 | As always, no answer. You say that semicolon is default, but the page say you can use both commas and semicolon. I don't think it is good if you change to what you prefer if both are accepted. "Just because you would like to tag in another way, doesn't mean you are right." |
|
| 83415156 | You are always so nice. I did not say I had ownership of something. I have put a lot of effort to add addresses so I try to keep the in a good shape. I often use OSM Inspector to find faults. The inspector did not like the semicolons and I checked if this was a fault or not. I found that that commas was also accepted and changed to see if this was a better. So now I had explained why I did this.
|
|
| 83415156 | I did some updates. Most of the address I changed was created by me. I changed from semicolon to comma to separate addresses. This is the most common way to do to. See osm.wiki/Addresses It is also OK to use semicolon, but I want to do it in the most common way. I just ask you to revert your changes.
|
|
| 83415156 | Please Archie, revert your changes. What I did was not wrong according to the page above. I do not see what is the purpose of your changes. |
|
| 83415156 | OSM Inspector föredrar kommatecken och på så sätt så får man mindre varnngar och hittar lättare fel. Men eftersom det inte är fel att ha kommatecken kan du väl gör revert på dina ändrinar. Det är dessutom vanligare att använda kommatecken än semikolon |