Bonjour, way #1222753538 n'existe pas (plus???). Je l'ai enleve en changeset #174078812 .

Hi, is it possible that you made a typo in the name? AFAICT the name should be Lombot?

Thanks for the feedback. I checked this (ref: https://natuurenbos.vlaanderen.be/sites/default/files/documenten/tr_meerdaalwoud-heverleebos_2022.pdf ) and you seem to be right. Side remark: I wonder if *anyone* that visits MDW actually has read this toegankelijjkheidsregeling. Especially, given the (increasing) amount of (forbidden) signs everywhere in the forest and the inconsistency between the local signposting and the toegankelijkheidsregeling which of the two would be prioritary in case of a discussion... It's like making a document where you insert a map with all the roads in Leuven and their accessibility, but not put any signposts in the streets :-)

For my interest: what are the remaining problems in your opinion?

(sorry for the spam :-)
Specifically for Belgium - osm.wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Highways - states
footway = Ways 'designed' for pedestrians where vehicles have no access. For me, the ways which are altered are not 'designed' for pedestrians (at all). It's just that the forest department chose certain access rights.

Also, I did check my other (2) changesets where I did similar edits ( #164394272 , #164394336 ) and afaict only this one had a problem with access rights not being present?

Hi, in the wiki, it states "Footways tend to be constructed and either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar). The elderly and small children and quite often also wheelchair users can use them with ease. They tend to be in urban settings, but not always. Access is primarily for pedestrians, which is often specified by street signs (or implied by local law)." These conditions are clearly not satisfied for these paths (or in some cases even tracks). Normally (unless I made a mistake which is perfectly possible), I did check for every modification if there were bicycle access tags on these ways, and added a motor_vehicle=no tag where they were missing. You comment did make me realise I didn't check for the horse riders though, so I will fix that. Makes sense?

Hi Dominiek82, in this changeset you altered the access rights to way/655895078 and set them to private. However, according to https://tragewegen.github.io/trage-wegen-in-je-buurt/?logo=true&lyrs=trw&base=osm&histo=&histTrans=0.5&x=4.653862&y=50.891425&z=17.38 the Kapelleweg (W56) should be accessible here from Brusselsesteenweg (at least for non-motorised traffic). Are you sure access=private is the correct tag here? TIA!

Zilvermeer stond er inderdaad al op, en de andere naam waarmee vaak naar deze vijver verwezen wordt nl. vijver Oud-Heverlee Noord (zie bv. https://waarnemingen.be/locations/30945/ ) is verdwenen door deze changeset. Wat mij betreft kan deze dus best ge-revert worden, of vervangen door een changeset die name en alt_name verwisselt (ttz. zilvermeer als 'name' en OHN als 'alt_name).

Vrij zeker van dat er geen naambordje staat :-) Ik zie wel dat de naam ondertussen gebruikt wordt door de ingenieursstudenten ( https://vtk.be/_publications/pdf/8b6a9ccff8183e14ce81442dd88f2444e2bd54a5.pdf ) maar dat lijkt me eerder een gevolg te zijn van de rendering op osm dan wel omgekeerd...

No, it is not official, you're right. I removed the tags.

Hi, in this changeset, you set way #932798599 to private, but the bicycle=yes tag is still there (meaning that bicycles are allowed to pass but pedestrians not for instance). Was this intended? TIA!

Hi, regarding way/119260155 : Could you also update (and/or resolve the notes in that area concerning the existence of the path?

Bonjour,
Est-ce que vous etes sur que way/308472533 existe et est accessible? Le sentier semble parcourir un pre et il n'y a pas (plus?) de grille?

Hi, I tried to find way/1137251600/ yesterday but couldn't find any signs of a path. Could it be that the strava traces are from people going "off-piste"?

No, not anymore, I've updated that: See changeset/134899670

Kind reminder. Verified multiple times but could not find any signposting. Do you have another source of information?

To the best of my knowledge, there is no forbidden signposting on either side of way/91929173 ?

Hi Bhiko, was this a permanent closure? I passed here last week downhill and this week uphill and couldn't notice any signposts indicating that the path is no longer accessible?

No problem. Thanks for your prompt reaction and action!