Thanks for finding this. The error has been corrected.

Thanks for catching this!

My building preset tag for amenity was incorrectly spelled!

It should be correct now.

-theArchDruid

Apologies, it seems the building footprints were represented as two individual objects rather than one. This error has been corrected, thank you for your help.

Cheers.
theArchDruid

I will make sure to use a barrier/bollard node instead of disconnecting the roads moving forward. Thanks again.

That makes sense. I'll reconnect the roads and add a barrier node.

Thanks for the help Phil.

I couldn't figure out which imagery set was more recent. Thanks for catching this -- I'll revert these changes.

I've added a track road where I removed the section of service road. You're correct, there does appear to be access to some facilities beyond Francis Road. However, I don't believe it is apt to call it a service road. Hopefully this settles the issue. Thanks for the help.

The correct tags have been restored. Thanks, as always, Phil.

-theArchDruid

I've removed the access restrictions from this way. According to my original change, the construction was supposed to continue until April of 2020. Apparently that is no longer the case.

Thanks for the help,

theArchDruid

After further review, you are correct. I believe I made this edit based on assumption. I will revert these changes. Thank you.

Hi friend,

Thank you for the great validation work. It appears I had caps lock on for this one, and was attempting to taking highway=service. I am almost always utilizing JOSM's validation tools, but will be more careful moving forward. T

Your friend,

theArchDruid

This was a difficult intersection to classify, and I absolutely understand your argument here. After further review, I agree with your classifications. Thank you for the help!
Your friend,
Gray

Mr. chachafish,

I understand your argument. However, these channelized turn lanes are separated by paint on the ground, which I would argue makes them links.

Wiki: "The _link tags are used to identify slip roads/ramps and "channelised" (physically separated by an obstruction or painted island) at-grade turning lanes connecting the through carriageways/through lanes of highways to other roadways of all types"

OR

osm.wiki/Highway_link

There are multiple sets of imagery showing this paint, in addition to street level imagery via OpenStreetCam.

Thank you for all of the work you do in Denver!

Your friend,

theArchDruid

Jon,

Absolutely. I have added the requested tags (as you indicated that they are valid). In the future, know that I do not typically add this kind of data, as I do not perform any of my own ground survey in the UK, nor do I assume that ways should receive the same tags simply because they are adjacent or intersecting one another.

Additionally, I encourage you to add this data on any and all ways that do not already have these tags. Your ground surveys are a much better source than the satellite imagery I am using.

Thanks for all of the work you do,

Gray

Interesting. My intention was merely to add lane information to some ways in this area. Massive overlook on my part that a segment of a primary road was deleted. I apologize and thank you for the help!

Bernard,

This mistake has been corrected. Thank you for your help!

Your friend,

Gray

Bernard,

This must have been by mistake. Thank you for finding and correcting this error, I appreciate the help.

Your friend,

Gray

Thank you all for your feedback.

Here is a link to Kaart's wikipedia page, with most of our projects listed. osm.wiki/Kaart

We are now aware that Bing Bird's Eye imagery is not a valid source for digitization into OSM. We understand that any edits made from this source are invalid.

We appreciate your time and effort in validating this data.
If you have any further questions or comments regarding our work in the UK, please feel free to contact me.

Thank you,

-Gray

I put in all 8 of the oneways intersecting that roundabout. 2 of them must have been reversed. I apologize for missing that, and thank you for fixing it.

Jan,

I believe this tag was unintentionally left on the way when I was trying to recall the correct tag "bus:lanes=designated", which was also tagged on this way.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and the extraneous tag has now been removed.

-theArchDruid