Ah great find. Thank you!

We should probably change this one back, although there is the path crossing the train tracks at Old Albert? I've been using the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry maps of wetlands and I should probably re-map the natural features wood/grassland but the park should go back the way it was.

I read the wikis. Very helpful. I think by their definition parts of many "parks" should have a different designation. The park polygons aren't supposed to denote the property boundary of the "park" itself. Take Clair Lake Park for instance. Only a part of it is usable playable grass. The Wiki Landuse=grass page says "There are often more appropriate tags for areas of grass." So for Clair Lake Park all grass should be park and any natural area should be converted to forest or grassland.

This is very helpful thanks! Yes the University environment is tough because there's so much open space. As I work on campus I'll be sure to differentiate between park and landuse=grass

Thank you for the context. I've been learning relations to better fill in habitat gaps but in this case you're right totally not needed.

A great word!

Are we trying to phase out multipolygons?