tguen's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 171562716 | 21 days ago | Please avoid using multipolygons unless they are really necessary. They make features harder to edit and in this case they provide no benefit. |
| 167203442 | 3 months ago | This building doesn't match any aerial imagery afaict. What is your source? The changeset lists "survey", but it looks like all of your changesets do despite being all across the country so I'm skeptical. Also please use better comments and accurate source tags for your changesets. |
| 167706450 | 6 months ago | How many of your accounts need to get banned before you quit doing this shit? |
| 164096103 | 7 months ago | This falls under the "One feature, one OSM element" principle. A shop tag represents a business. If each building has a shop tag it implies that each is a separate business. If you're using building extracts, you can use the building tag to denote its purpose, e.g. building=storage. Unfortunately there is no easy and reliable way to associate a building with a business. |
| 164096103 | 7 months ago | Please don't add multiple shop tags for the same business. One on the main building or the area containing all the buildings is enough. |
| 163932317 | 9 months ago | This changeset was fixing nodes tagged as buildings that are in ways tagged as buildings. There are about 1500 instances across the continent. When working at this scale, the Pacific Northwest is about as local as I can get without making 100+ changesets. TBH I don't understand why it matters. |
| 163508749 | 10 months ago | Hello. There is no discussion or documentation for this edit as I don't think it's necessary. I just found some values for house=* on taginfo that had an obviously equivalent and documented value. I downloaded them with an overpass query in JOSM, reviewed several chosen at random, and mass-retagged them. Thank you for pointing out the mistagged nodes. I should have checked the nodes more carefully but didn't think about it. Someone has already fixed them but I'm planning on searching for and fixing similar errors. |
| 161213089 | 10 months ago | It appears you still haven't learned how to tag buildings and continue to make errors like tagging the outer way of a multipolygon as a road. If you can't put in the effort to edit correctly then why bother editing the map at all? Is mapping part of your job as an employee of Mill Creek? |
| 154708130 | 10 months ago | Surely you're aware, but for the record you did not add the building tag back. I did. |
| 161569831 | 10 months ago | reverted. quit spamming this garbage and follow the organized editing guidelines or you will be reported. |
| 162394431 | 10 months ago | reverted; the hotel is not signed as "Courtyard by Marriott Portland City Center" |
| 161389217 | 10 months ago | Please restore the building tag. |
| 161110964 | 10 months ago | Please restore the building tag. |
| 159666637 | 10 months ago | Why are you removing the building tag? please restore it. |
| 147444686 | 11 months ago | According to Bing Streetside imagery, this hotel is signed only as Mariott Suites, and the name tag should match. Please fix. |
| 150159782 | 11 months ago | According to Bing Streetside imagery, this hotel is signed only as Hilton Garden Inn, and the name tag should match. Please fix. |
| 150174850 | 11 months ago | According to Bing Streetside imagery, this hotel is signed only as Hilton Garden Inn, and the name tag should match. Please fix. |
| 152076113 | 11 months ago | According to Bing Streetside imagery, this hotel is signed only as Hyatt Place, and the name tag should match. Please fix. |
| 152850774 | 11 months ago | According to Bing Streetside imagery, this hotel is signed only as Hilton, and the name tag should match. Please fix. |
| 153233622 | 11 months ago | According to Bing Streetside imagery, this hotel is not signed Oceanside Beach. This information belongs in the branch tag. |