Why did you change brand:wikidata to not:brand:wikidata? This is wrong, please revert.

Please square the buildings you edited here. I've already asked you twice.

Please remove the email and denomination tags, they belong to the previous occupant.

If bicycles arent allowed on Butler Creek Trail, you should remove the bicycle tag. If they are, you should change them back from footways to paths.

Again, when editing building shapes please press Q to square the corners.

Ive removed the website. It was for another business with the same name in South Carolina.

What is your source for this ALPR? I can't find any source that LiveView even makes them.

Please don't cut out parts of buildings just because they're covered by trees. Also be aware that aerial imagery can be taken from an angle that makes the shape look different than it actually is.

when you edit buildings or other areas, please press Q to square the corners wherever it's appropriate.

I just removed this business. It was from an SEO spam note, the website doesn't work and the facebook page is barely used for years.

Please avoid using multipolygons unless they are really necessary. They make features harder to edit and in this case they provide no benefit.

This building doesn't match any aerial imagery afaict. What is your source? The changeset lists "survey", but it looks like all of your changesets do despite being all across the country so I'm skeptical.

Also please use better comments and accurate source tags for your changesets.

How many of your accounts need to get banned before you quit doing this shit?

This falls under the "One feature, one OSM element" principle. A shop tag represents a business. If each building has a shop tag it implies that each is a separate business.

If you're using building extracts, you can use the building tag to denote its purpose, e.g. building=storage. Unfortunately there is no easy and reliable way to associate a building with a business.

osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Please don't add multiple shop tags for the same business. One on the main building or the area containing all the buildings is enough.

This changeset was fixing nodes tagged as buildings that are in ways tagged as buildings. There are about 1500 instances across the continent. When working at this scale, the Pacific Northwest is about as local as I can get without making 100+ changesets. TBH I don't understand why it matters.

Hello. There is no discussion or documentation for this edit as I don't think it's necessary. I just found some values for house=* on taginfo that had an obviously equivalent and documented value. I downloaded them with an overpass query in JOSM, reviewed several chosen at random, and mass-retagged them.

Thank you for pointing out the mistagged nodes. I should have checked the nodes more carefully but didn't think about it. Someone has already fixed them but I'm planning on searching for and fixing similar errors.

It appears you still haven't learned how to tag buildings and continue to make errors like tagging the outer way of a multipolygon as a road. If you can't put in the effort to edit correctly then why bother editing the map at all? Is mapping part of your job as an employee of Mill Creek?

Surely you're aware, but for the record you did not add the building tag back. I did.

reverted. quit spamming this garbage and follow the organized editing guidelines or you will be reported.

osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Guidelines