Hi Kovoschiz,
Thank you for your response, and thanks for making the edit.

-tealeaf6

Hi Kovoschiz,
I noticed that you added the `ref=NT842` tag of osm.org/way/756052367 and osm.org/way/452269551, and this value is already in the `traffic_signals:ref` tag. Based on this communication where the tag was discussed previously, osm.org/changeset/78489168, would it be possible for you to edit these ways so that the value `NT842` is only in the `traffic_signals:ref` tag? Alternatively, I could make this edit instead.
Thank you,
-tealeaf6

Hi, thanks for reaching out! I have used Maxar Premium Imagery to add these service roads, including osm.org/way/877309303. The road looks clear and defined here on this imagery source. Please feel free to reach out if you have other questions.

Hi, thanks for reaching out! I added these as service roads to match the classification of the connecting highways. I believe residential would be more appropriate, but osm.org/way/352118620 and a portion of osm.org/way/45416648 should also be reclassified. Let me know what you think.

Hi, thanks for the question. Apple has an agreement with Digital Globe/Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source. The imagery I used is from 2019-03-19 and confirmed the existence of osm.org/way/877674771 and osm.org/way/877672839.

Correction: the image cited was from 2019-03-19

Hi, thanks for reaching out! I added this road based on Bing aerial imagery, but I agree it is difficult to see. I am confident I see where it bends north, through a gap in the trees, to where it connects to osm.org/way/825356913. Do you agree?

Hi, thanks for the question. Apple has an agreement with Digital Globe/Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source. The imagery I used is from 2020-05-07 and confirmed the existence of roads osm.org/way/877614517 and osm.org/way/877614518.

Hi, thank you for reaching out. After looking at it again, the road here osm.org/way/877697226 doesn’t look as significant. Thank you for finding this, I have changed the classification to track road.

Hi, thanks for reaching out. I have used Maxar Premium Imagery to add these residential highways, on which the roads appear to be clear and established. Please feel free to reach out if you have other questions.

Hi, thank you for reaching out. I have used ESRI World Imagery to add these residential highways, including osm.org/way/877320014. The roads here appear clear and access the buildings. Please feel free to reach out if you have other questions.