OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
74189050 over 6 years ago

Hi adiatmad,

Thanks for flagging, this was updated by mistake. Deleted the incorrect tag.

Thanks,
tahasin

68329615 over 6 years ago

Hi Diana IRM-ED,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the node/3812842016 and node/604021468 classified as 'tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'track' as the path is no clear in any of the imagery

And from node/3812842016 till node/3604021778 it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance.

47189234 over 6 years ago

Hi Dewantari Olga,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/482949013
way/482949014 classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'
And from node/4757221483 to node/4757221621 and till node/4757221488

Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.

62390949 over 6 years ago

Hi Hady Prast22,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across way/623957830 classified as 'UnClassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
Please look into this and share your observations

Thanks in advance.

55255763 over 6 years ago

Hi armasari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way/547815154
way/551569398
way/551578219
classified as 'UnClassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
Please look into this and share your observations

Thanks in advance.

55340164 over 6 years ago

Hi ikopanjirukmana,

Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way/552250494
way/552250495
way/552250496
way/552250500
classified as "un-classified". However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
As of now making necessary changes, Please revert if it is otherwise.

Thanks in Advance

38692390 almost 7 years ago

Hi dgitto,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way/656615979
way/411674066
way/411674050
way/411674069
way/411674036 classified as 'Track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance.

56812875 about 7 years ago

Hi adiatmad,

While working on this area, i came across the road geometry fixed by you which seems to be incorrect.

Configuration here should be round about continuing with a split road.

Please look into these edits and confirm.

Thanks,
tahasin.