OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
168807128

HI marczoutendijk. The amenity=tourism tag wasn't mine, but I agree with your take and have amended it as you suggest.
thanks
simon

175932889

Fair point. I've added an abandoned:highway & a note.

174439110

Well yes or no. I specified the URL of the search screen for Aberdeenshire HER; you've supplied the tagINFO page for the ref: on OSM. All that we need now is for someone to document the tag, which I may get around to doing. See also similar tags for Angus and Highland.

174533760

Yes, looks good now. Sorry about my error; thank you for fixing it.

I'll get around to documenting the ref sometime. It's here: https://online.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/smrpub/master/detail.aspx?refno=NK14NW0419

174385047

It's the Aberdeenshire Historic Environment Record record ID for this bridge & its plaques. https://online.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/smrpub/master/detail.aspx?refno=NJ92NE0042

174439110

It's the Aberdeenshire historic Environment Record reference ID - see https://online.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/smrpub/master/default.aspx?Authority=Aberdeenshire

174516332

points to this - https://online.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/smrpub/master/default.aspx?Authority=Angus

172903200

Hi Dave. Respectfully, you do not get to specify whether the station has "the correct number of railway stations tags."

ref:cranmore is a typo; should be ref:canmore

ref:canmore=*

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ref%3Acanmore#overview

https://www.trove.scot/place/12768

170002291

Correct; my bad. Thanks.

169084387

Yes; thx.

65356694

The building is the Alnwick Railway Station building - now no longer a railway station post Beeching; prior to my edit it was tagged completely as BarterBooks, which in fact occupies only a small segment of the building. So, clumsy attempt to make things better than they were. I'm sufficient of a newbie not to know the best way to do things, so please don't hesitate to amend.