Thank you for letting me know, aixbrick, and for fixing the issue. I wasn't aware of this porcedure and the lifecycle prefix. I'll try to avoid such mistakes in the future.

All the best,
Torsten

Thank you for the explanation. I was under the impression that there is one way of tagging certain entities and it is interesting to learn that there are national differences.

Sorry if I did not do this correctly but the idea was for it to be consistent here. Should I delete the note and add the building or is there a way to change the node to a building? And just to be clear, for the hotels I edited the hotel was always the entire buidling and not just a few floors.

Hi eggie,
The hotel, similar to other hotels I edited, was on the map as a node. Other hotels are typically labelled as a building e.g. way/21260475, way/31728160 or way/35742277. Shouldn't those nodes be changed to buidlings?

Thank you for your help as always eggie! I really appreciate it while I am still learning.

Thank you eggie! I really appreciate you taking the time to explain all that. I checked the Waalbtoekervoetpad and there is definitely no public access to I changed it to private.

Just looked at a few of the other edit. I understand your explanation and will stick to it now but it does not really make sense in a logical way. Access all = yes is simply wrong when it is not allowed for all the access. This is why I set it to no. But if it has to be yes if any of the more specific entries is yes so be it. Again thanks for educating me; still learning all of this.

Thanks for your feedback, eggie. I wasn't aware of that but what you suggest makes perfect sense. I will correct it accordingly

Hi eggie! The source is that I was there yesterday and there is no path or track whatsoever. It is all field in all directions I could see expect for the two trails and the intersection. If you think it is not appropriate to delete I can undo it. But again, I found it rather misleading because there was truly nothing but field