Wrong Edit, please be more carefull next time !

Please try tu use a better OSM editor than rapid ... :(

Hello,
That part of the city is under heavy development, with many new residential areas constructed simultaneously.
Some elements are added as information based on official plan approvals, and confirmed by filed surveys.
Some New Bus Stops are planned, others are already built on road , but the bus line is not yet routed to use this new stops. Maybe a planned / under construction status would be required for them.

Nu este cazul, am reparat eu. Toti putem gresi (neintentionat), doar v-am rugat ca sa fiti mai atent pe viitor :)

Va rog frumos mai multa grija, la urmatorele modificari de harta, sa nu modificati altceva decat ati intentionat.
(Acum ati mutat o strada peste cladiri cand ati mutat harta)

Hello,
Normally I would agree with you.
But this was some minor error fixes (removing duplicated nodes from ways) and instead of having individual changes-set for each fixed way I preferred to bundle some fixes. But I can re-think that strategy for the future.

Ideally the editors should not allow the introduction of that kind of errors in the first place ... IMHO

La statii de autobuz , TREBUIE folosit denumirile lor oficiale (cel afisat in orarul RATBAV / statie / panou de pe stalp care marcheaza statia

Hello,
On the next edit please also take care of the relations passing (Public Transit in this case) the edited ways

Hello, why you marked this beacon as disused ?
This is a new airport and that device was installed right before the airport was opened about 1 year ago

Hello I have to revert your changes here.
Indeed there is a street naming anomaly, but It is wrong as you set.
a few steerts there has no name and one of the street changes the name on the middle (where the one way ends)

I don;t have any authoritative information about the airfield, but it seems very active this days, and I don't think that will be decommissioned. The same aeroclub manages the another nearby airfield LRSP at Sanpetru. Also this airfield serves as a base airfield for the plane constructor company IAR Brasov. In my opinion the future of this airfield is still secured for now.

Finally!
The https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=GHV is also confirms the correct code allocation.

Regarding the IATA code, I did find an articel, where the official letter from IATA is published, confirming the allocation of the code GHV to this Airport:
https://boardingpass.ro/ghv-este-codul-iata-alocat-oficial-aeroportului-din-brasov/

However the IATA free search tool is still not return anything (yet).

Why you set the road surface to Gravel instead of Asphalt ?????????

The first official flight is shceduled to 15 June, also regular flight is scheduled to start from 15-16 June

I can't comment (yet) in the IATA db search
regarding the ICAO:
https://www.aisro.ro/files/amdt/LR_Amdt_A_2023_06_en.pdf

also: https://www.bizbrasov.ro/2023/05/13/aeroport-ghimbav-cod-sisteme-rezervare-zboruri/

see: https://www.bizbrasov.ro/2023/05/26/aeroportul-brasov-ghimbav-ministrul-transporturilor-emite-ordin-pentru-certificarea-ca-aeroport-international/

The IATA / ICAO codes are confirmed now so please revert your changes

mda, e mai grafic, dar aparent mai prostut..
la anumite obiecte nu stie de valirile implicite si vrea sa adaug o cheie oarecare, care doar umfla harta cu date priprietati adaugate in plus (care in mod normal au valori implicite)