OK so is it just a specific case when footpaths and bridleways are being flagged automatically as being access=yes and the guidance is to change it to no with specific sub tags specifying what's allowed? I assume this should only happen if the original editor incorrectly set the access=yes tag in the first place?

I wasn't certain of this layout as the bing imagery is a mix of old and new. That's why I asked for a review. I shall leave well alone.

Pillboxes are my speciality, I curate a database of their locations across the uk. Obviously they have no military purpose any more but the tags specifically exist for them under the Military bunker tag (although strictly they aren't bunkers either as they aren't underground). They aren't museums or memorials or even ruins as some have been tagged so I feel these are inappropriate tags as they were built for military purposes only.

Either a mistake or it was flagged as incorrect by the automated problem detection system.

Fair enough but as I commented on another of your reversions a recreation ground implies public access which is not the case with private cricket and football clubs which are defaulted to recreation ground when upgrading the outdated leisure facility tag. I have taken to using sports club without the building tag in the case of private grounds.

I was attempting to avoid this being called a recreation ground when upgrading the tags. That tag would imply this is public access which it isn't because it's a school playing field. I would have thought these shouldn't be mapped seperately at all and just be part of the school grounds. Perhaps there should be a new tag created for school playing fields?

Apologies this was accidental.

It's a pedestrian bridge. My understanding of the access tags for highways (from the recommendations from osmose etc) is that the top level tag should only be yes if there is access for all transport types and no if access is limted to only certain types, with those types set to yes in the lower level tags. Your coment implies it should only be no if there is no access whatsoever and that leaving the top level tag greyed out as yes implies that it is actually no. This is confusing, what's right?