I must have added the tag and forgot to fill it out lol!

Also please don't edit the whole world in a single changeset. Keep your edits confined to smaller local areas like metro areas. Thanks.

Yes, this I would contend that the trunk classification would be only north of Manchester and all the way to 270.

Just commented on the route 100 changeset.

I did not see the recommendation against 'islands of trunk roads'. But as the second half states that very important roads in rural areas can be designated as trunks even if undivided, then yeah, extend it to Gray Summit.

Ok, I was going by this: "In areas of high population density, to expressways that meet most, but not all, of the requirements for highway=motorway, and provide connectivity between motorways and other trunk roads. These roads should also be tagged expressway=yes."

Maxar's alignment is quite a bit off. I would suggest using NAIP if you're looking for newer imagery.

See my latest edit, you have to look at all imagery -- Maxar most up to date.

We need software that inhibits edits over a certain square mileage. That's the only answer to this problem.

For one, "Archies House."

way/1058204092/history

Try making smaller changesets. Idealistically, they should be no larger than 50 square miles.

Maxar has a drawback though, it doesn't align with the others. You should add a temporary point of reference in Bing, switch to Maxar, and the offset the imagery until it lines up.

Seems to be the most up to date, along with NAIP.

The other criteria I used was the suffixes "Way", "Place", or "Alley" -- these are complimentary to main streets with the same name.

Better*

See changeset/117867025

I downgraded this to trunk a while back because of all the turnoffs into sideroads -- something a full motorway wouldn't allow.

It's all good, I fixed it a few days ago.

Meaning you reverted a change I made from my own local knowledge.

I spent a lot of time and effort on the new configuration of Route N and Weiss Rd. None of the various aerial imageries are up to date enough to reflect the recent change.