Oh, and as a side note, I think that 5.5m max height covers the whole of this road.

Hi Diogenes. I am not sure that cutting up into multiple ways causes errors, but it does make the map slower to load IF there is no good reason - hence I join like segments whenever possible. If the tags do not agree, they cannot be joined and I think that what you are doing with max height is good!

As regards covered, I looked at this tag for a section of road at the new airport (!!!) and it is specially said not to use under bridges, but you had already changed this so not a problem

I had seen the change but had not realised that this was because of the tag. Thanks for correcting. I think that it is unnecessary to use this tag though, as defect a bridge covers whatever is underneath ? I leave you to decide

It is possible - I do not know - but if you have two one way roads without exit, this leads to routing errors. If there are two ways, please add the second one but do join them underground to avoid routing errors

Good afternoon. This is nothing more than a track, and the road is not referenced on any signage. From Namibe it is signed as to Lucira, and from Benguela to Cimo. The only signed route from Benguela to Namibe is via Lubango.

It now appears that there is a drivable route here in a semi desert area with no fuel stations - this change could lead unprepared people to drive it. Further, it is impassable in the rainy seasons!

The construction looks to have been abandoned years ago btw

I have driven the section of road concerned. I have mapped the primary as under construction, but the actual road is just the service roads left for construction and classifying as anything other than a track would be incorrect. This is 4x4 only, and the satellite imagery is very old on this section

ENI is the name of an operator - it may once have been an abbreviation but it is now the full name, and ENI is what is posted all over the building

Hi Diogenes

Yes it was pedestrian only, but they have now reopened it to traffic, which in turn changes the turn permissions back to the old rules

I agree that there is a restricted route where you had placed it - my apologies for its removal. I have reinstated it as a permissive service road with no intersecting nodes on congress do MPLA, and the two lift barriers. I am not sure that it serves a lot, but it does exist as you said.

Good morning Diogenes

It is no longer physically possible (if it ever was) to cross Congress do MPLA at this point - There is a no entry sign at the turn. You have to continue to the roundabout to do a U turn.

Sorry about this - I deleted to facilitate modification but forgot to reinstate and I agree that there is a separation along the length of the road. I have now added it back in. I do not agree however that this is a pedestrian path, and have added it as a traffic island area. Some realignment still needs to be done.