Yes! Good. Now it looks great. Thank you for taking the time to do this.

Hello, aceman444!

I changed the tags based on the data from the OSM Wiki at the link: sport=motor It is said that the tag "highway=raceway" is more suitable for linear objects. Based on this article and the fact that the territory includes the racing area and building, I came to the conclusion that “leisure=sports_centre” is the more correct tag.
But I didn't notice that the area is used for the show. I’m sorry for my carelessness and thank you for paying my attention to this.

I studied another article about raceways again (highway=raceway ), where it says that small raceways can be mapped as a polygon with adding the tag “area=yes”, but the building should be excluded from this area. Another option for this area is using the tag “area:highway=raceway”. Both options require changing the geometry.
One more option that I see is using “tourism=attraction” for the area, it doesn’t require geometry changes, but it will be a cause of the duplication (there is such a point nearby).

So, in my opinion the best way is using the tag “area:highway=raceway” and fixing geometry.
What is the best way in your opinion?

Based on OSM Wiki and visual observation via Bing Streetside it can be seen that the tag "building=yes" in addition to other tags does not suit these objects
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168686508

Greetings, Xavizard Knight!
I think you are indeed right. In this changeset, I decided to change the polygonal pedestrian zones into linear objects and connect them to the nearest paths. I made the change, taking as a basis not only aerial photographs, but also previously made changes by other users. This is probably what confused me.
As for tags, this is really my mistake. I deleted the way that goes through the backyard and fixed the tags of the way which goes through the garden .
Thank you for bringing the mistake to my attention. I’ll be more attentive while editing. Also feel free to fix my edits if needed.
Sincerely, squeaker_andrus.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167262598