Hi, are you sure that this is no longer oneway street? Based on latest street level imagery, from 23. October 2025 it is clearly signed as oneway street on both ends and I have mapped it as such.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1179016561021969

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=623720980763285

Considering you made changes solely based on some satellite imagery, please double check the change you have made.

Zdravo, malo zakasnih ali me interesuje da li imamo kakve nove informacije u vezi sa ovim načinom mapiranja? Možemo li da dobijemo neke primjere, prakse gdje se ovako mapira? Pošto se ni ja, do sada, nisam susreo sa ovakvim načinom mapiranja.

Recimo, meni veoma pogrešno djeluje ucrtavanje zgrada na ovaj način. Skrajanje multipoligon relacija od više linija, kada su u pitanju jednostavni poligoni zgrade koje bi trebalo ucrtati samo jednom zatvorenom linijom i tagovati odgovarajućim building tagom, i sve to samo kako bi se ispoštovalo neko pravilo o zajedničkom zidu dvije zgrade. Nisam vidio da neko na OSM-u obraća pažnju na to niti da je to negdje dokumentovano. Iskreno ni ne znam kako na trenutno dostupnim ortofoto snimcima možemo da utvrdimo da li je u pitanju zajedniči zid ili ne.

Dodato je jer je tako signalizacija sugerisala 2024. godine, kada je i dodata relacija. Postoji znak ili je barem postojao te godine, koji ukazuje da kamioni moraju da idu tim putem:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=44.255307704166995&lng=20.078500933332975&z=17.48248204233847&pKey=2008762472976766&focus=photo&x=0.5821372081939892&y=0.5193297075864889&zoom=0.9575130185932692

Da li postoji i danas, nemam pojma. Uostalom ne vidim kako ovo može da utiče na bilo šta osim na kamione, pošto je zabrana skretanja pravilno tagovana da se odnosi samo na njih, a ne na druge vrste transporta.

Fully reverted in changeset: 185489117

Please do not add destination refs that do not exist on destination signs on the ground. Also, you can't put all refs into destination:ref, they need to be put accordingly into destination:ref for local and destination:int_ref for international numbering.

Hi CikaAki93, can you provide more information about your edits, and are these edits related to a video game called Farming Simulator?

Note for others, we had in past different user (@Deronje) who was tracing and naming farmlands in similar manner with numerical values. The community found out that user was doing it for farming simulator, hence my question above. If this is the case, then this changeset (and all the others) should probably be reverted, especially because in this one the user deleted bunch of multipolygons and seemingly correct data.

Hi, not sure what you mean, my changeset description is quite clear and you can check history of element for more details.

But since you asked, I have fixed name tag which was 'Раткова пещера', considering word 'пещера' is foreign word it has no place in name tag in Montenegro.

This changeset has been fully reverted in: 184793162

Please be more careful not to accidentally drag nodes across half a city when you are panning the map. You have dragged several buildings, which caused plenty issues.

This changeset has been fully reverted in: 184793399

Please be more careful, in order to not delete or ruin valid data.

This changeset has been fully reverted in changeset: 184793687

Please be more careful, not to deleted data that is correct.

Hi, could how explain how this road is not accessible by cars, when imageries clearly show cars parked alongside it?

Reverted in changeset: 182876763

Ref number was repeated on purpose, as it is related to second and third entry on the sign.

Reverted in changeset: 181217033

Based on latest Mapillary images, only small section of the road is one way, while rest of it is bidirectional.

Hi, based on what did you made these changes? Do you have local knowledge or was this based on fact that this used to be name of country so you assumed that it is wrong and outdated?

Unless something changed recently, Serbia and Montenegro do have joint company that operates to this day. If this has changed, please provide sources that confirm that. Otherwise please revert your changes.

Best regards

Dobro došli na OSM!

Slažem se da je ovo zemljani put i da ne može baš svako vozilo da prođe tuda, međutim u poslednjoj izmjeni ste (vjerovatno slučajno) promjenili klasifikaciju ovog puta. Prebacili ste iz highway=track u highway=tertiary, i time ga praktično unaprijedili u dosta visoku klasifikaciju koja bi navela rutere na pogrešno tumačenje pa samim tim bi došlo i do pogrešnog rutiranja.

Juče sam vratio klasifikaciju puta u highway=track, što je ispravna klasifikacija za zemljani put kroz njive.

Što se tiče komentara, on bi trebao da sadrži neki kraći komentar ili opis izmjena koje ste napravili u samom tom changeset-u. Ovdje osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments možete da dobijete više informacija i vidite neke primjere.

Ukoliko imate pitanja ili vam treba savjet prilikom mapiranja na OSM-u, možete kontaktirati OSM zajednicu Srbije na zvaničnom OSM forumu ili na Telegram grupi.

Srećno mapiranje!

Zdravo, da li možete da mi pojasnite šta ste htjeli da postignete ovim izmjenama? Pošto kada pročitam komentar koji ste ostavili nije mi jasno kakve veze sa OSM-om ima to što ovaj put ne postoji na Guglu.

Zdravo, dobra praksa je da se ostavlja changeset komentar kada se izvrši upload izmjena na OSM, takođe unosi se i izvor koji ste tom prilikom koristili.

Komentar bi trebalo da opiše ukratko šta ste uradili ili koje ste izmjene napravili. Što se tiče izvora, ako ste ucrtavali objekte putem ortofoto snimka onda navedite u polju 'Source' koji ste koristili, npr. Bing, Esri, Mapbox...

Evo link ka nekoliko primjera osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Srdačan pozdrav

Hi 007Transformer, what exactly did you mean with this comment? Changeset ID you provided is pointing out to the changeset which I have already reverted.

Hi, during your alignment of the roads for some reason you have deleted single node which contained information about traffic sign. Was this accidental or on purpose because traffic sign doesn't exist anymore? If it was removed by mistake, please restore the node.

Hi,

You have added multiple duplicated crossings in this changesets. The crossings which are regulated by traffic signals were already mapped. I have removed those extra nodes in this changeset: 178546497

Please be more careful next time.

Hi,

Edits made to the road geometry, are reverted in this changeset: 178542678

Please, do not add artificial geometries when there is no physical separation on the road. This is clearly visible on aerial imageries and on Mapillary.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=44.98146829999999&lng=19.58693829999993&z=17.913496982523235&focus=photo&dateFrom=2026-02-03&pKey=937999732286264&x=0.49095529729498044&y=0.5413917856089162&zoom=0