smallCat's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 174659738 | about 2 months ago | chenxiangzi 您好,osm不是私人地图,请不要把测试内容提交上来 |
| 173452283 | 3 months ago | 已于changeset/173472636 改正 |
| 173452283 | 3 months ago | 哦这样啊,我之前没注意到 |
| 172769905 | 3 months ago | I have fixed it in changeset/172784963 |
| 172769905 | 3 months ago | The West Lake Cultural Landscape of Hangzhou is relation/13164471 |
| 172769905 | 3 months ago | Hello alkino, thank you for your edit. But actually, the AAAAA scenic spot is "West Lake Cultural Landscape of Hangzhou", not the West Lake itself. |
| 172424212 | 3 months ago | loast您好,osm是描述真实世界的公共地图,请根据现实情况绘制地图。您的变更集已于 changeset/172614987 回退 |
| 172372338 | 3 months ago | 高速motorway |
| 172372338 | 3 months ago | 勘误:应该是motorway 国道trunkway 省道primary 现代secondary 乡道 tertiary |
| 172372338 | 3 months ago | 当然关于道路等级一直以来都有争议,目前比较明确的是高速motorway 国道primary 省道secondary 县道 tertiary 这些。但是对于中国城市内部道路的标法,始终没有一个明确的标准 |
| 172372338 | 3 months ago | 需要看道路在路网中的重要性和用途,学校内的道路即使再宽也属于内部道路,不应该标注tertiary及以上的等级。个人观点是学校内主干道标unclassified/residential (取决于在教学区还是在教职工居民区),较小道路标service。步行+自行车道路标path,仅步行标footway。当然osm论坛里有些老外认为学校内部行车道路应该统一标service,个人认为不太合适 |
| 172372338 | 3 months ago | 已于changeset/172391801 回退 |
| 172372338 | 3 months ago | Hibanaw您好,学校内部不应该使用过高的道路等级(如tertiary) |
| 171565465 | 4 months ago | Hello alkino, West Lake is not the same as West Lake Cultural Landscape. The AAAAA tag should write in West Lake Cultural Landscape, not West Lake. |
| 170423504 | 5 months ago | 你好,在中国大陆请使用简体字作为name,繁体字可以标在name:zh-Hant里 |
| 169083802 | 5 months ago | Why IT company is a bench? Why the bench belong to seoul subway line 2? |
| 169199578 | 6 months ago | Hi katpatuka, thank you for your contribution to mapping in China — it's much appreciated!
|
| 168173828 | 6 months ago | 你好,请尽量把变更集弄的小一点,不要把新加坡和大连的编辑放在一个变更集里 |
| 161701569 | 11 months ago | 平度农村的道路等级是否有些太高了 |
| 157702434 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I wander why Uijeongbu (relation/2409183) has two route(route 1322836369 ,route 1322836364) that within the boundary of the city. I have watched the Uijeongbu boundary in naver map and wikipedia, none of them have these two route. Could you please tell me the reason, thank you very much! 안녕하세요, 나는 왜 Uijeongbu (관계 2409183) 가 도시 경계 내에 두 개의 노선 (노선 1322836369, 노선 1322836354) 이 있는지 알고 싶습니다.나는 naver 지도와 위키백과에서 Uijeongbu 경계를 보았는데, 그들은 모두 이 두 노선이 없었다.이유를 말씀해 주시겠어요? 감사합니다! |