What part of this business is open 24/7? This is highly unusual for a storage facility; normally the office is open during normal business hours during the week and reduced hours on weekends (something like: Mo-Fr 09:00-17:00, Sa 10:00-16:00; Su 12:00-16:00) and the gates are open for typical daylight into early nighttime (06:00-21:00 or similar).

The comment is also completely inaccurate for what the changeset actually is, including the source.

This changeset appears to have deleted a lot of previously added lane count/lane use information, while copying the same comment from the changeset that added it. It is really frustrating to only find this three years later. Please be more careful when mapping, particularly in Houston, in the future.

This changeset comment, too, is nearly useless, and would be better described with something like: "Updated Walmart locations across the US"

This changeset comment is nearly useless; please consider making comments that actually describe the changes being made, such as: "Updated Brakes Plus and Express Oil Change locations across the southern US"

Building outline with address restored in changeset/70889517. In the future please do not delete the whole building unless it's actually confirmed demolished, either by your own survey or satellite photos.

This change is to a road. How can it possibly be a "NEW STORE"?

Where did you get the address from?

Next time, please look for the feature mapped as a node first, and if it is, merge the information into the building outline.

@rene78 I am aware of these other tools, but they do nothing to actually fix the issue with OSM's own history button.

Please confine changesets to a smaller area. The bounding box for this changeset covers large portions of six continents (basically, half the world) and this makes it more difficult to see local changesets using OSM's history function.

Why does this changeset include a change in the northwestern US? This makes the bounding box cover half the world.

Eek. No idea why the bounding box on this one is so damn big.

What is your source for the data?

What exactly is this way supposed to represent? It was not tagged at all in the original edit?

Hi,

In case you are new to adding brand new roads to OSM, names should be spelled out, not abbreviated (i.e. "Seabiscuit Boulevard" not "Seabiscuit Blvd") as it causes problems with some text-to-speech software (including navigation programs which speak the directions).

Also you have this commented as "Tavola" but a good portion of these edits are actually in Lilliput Farms to the north. It would have been more helpful to see "Updated road layout in Tavola and Lilliput Farms subdivisions" or similar.

I am aware of the other tools to view OSM changesets. Honestly, most of the time I prefer to use the history button as it's always available and not on some other site I have to bookmark and copy/paste location info to. I am not ignoring your so-called "solutions". I am acknowledging them, and at the same time rejecting them as unacceptable. It's like asking me to wear earplugs because I can't stand the noise of someone belching loudly at the dinner table.

Please split this into multiple changesets for each region next time. There's no reason for the bounding box to include the entire continental US.

@DaveF that's exactly the problem. The bounding box covers the entire planet including most of the US, including my hometown where there are no edits. There is no reason to not split this up into separate changesets, say, one per country.

A better changeset comment would have been: "Added residential area near Brookshire" or even just "Added residential area". We can (usually) tell the area from the changeset bounding box (the orange rectangle enclosing everything that was changed when you view the changeset online).