Hi,

Thank you for your feedback. There appears to be a knowledge gap with the editor which resulted in this error.

Let us assure you that very edit made by us on OSM is reviewed by our internal team for quality assurance.
To ensure that we identify and correct any errors that may have occurred in this task, as suggested by you we will recheck all edits made by niskumal and yadavzhi and take necessary actions to avoid any future misses.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

Thank you for your suggestion. Upon performing the necessary checks we see that there is no physical road existing in ground reality based on the available aerial views. The pavement is obscured by vegetation in all the available imageries. Hence I have deleted the segments.

If you have any local information about the physical existence of the road, request you to kindly let us know and we will make the necessary edits from our end.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

We appreciate you reviewing the changeset and alerting us to this. The editor has accidentally made an incorrect edit . I have reverted the edits in the changeset #133115812 and will ensure that such errors do not flow from our end. We appreciate your feedback.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi ,

Thank you for bringing this to our notice. The editor has made the changes based on the information provided on the wiki regarding the highway=residential tags.
"Roads carrying primarily through traffic, or non-residential traffic, should instead be tagged with another highway tag (e.g. unclassified, tertiary) as appropriate (see highways). Roads to individual dwellings would normally be tagged as highway=service (and likely service=driveway)."
However, considering the nature of the entities the segment could have been retained as residential. Hence as per your suggestion, I have made the necessary changes. Your feedback is highly valued.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. It is absolutely unnecessary to connect roads with the land-use features. This is a honest mistake made by the editor as the land-use features were disabled due to internal technical issues. We will ensure to be mindful going forward. The necessary changes have being made in the changeset #133114577. Appreciate your patience .

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the changeset and brining this our notice. The editor has made the edits based on outdated internal imagery due to a technical issue. I have reverted the edits in the changeset #133114843 and will ensure that such errors do not flow from our end. We appreciate your feedback.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi GinaroZ,

Thank you for reviewing the changeset and brining this our notice. The editor has made the edits based on outdated internal imagery due to a technical issue. I have reverted the edits in the changeset #133114581 and will ensure that such errors do not flow from our end. We appreciate your feedback.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

We appreciate you making the necessary corrections and alerting us about this. The editor has accidentally deleted the tags. To prevent such mistakes in the future, we have given the editor strict feedback.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the changeset and making the necessary corrections. We have provided feedback to the editor to ensure that the future edits are made using lastest resources available to avoid such errors.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

Thank you for your valuable feedback.
Thank you once again for the support, looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

Thank you for reviewing our changeset and highlighting the issue.

Apologies for adding incorrect turn restrictions. We have made the necessary corrections in the Changeset # 128931963. It's an honest mistake from our end. We have provided feedback to the editor to avoid such mistakes in the future edits.

Thanks for the support, looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi MxxCon,

Thank you for reviewing our change set and highlighting the issue. We have made the necessary changes in changeset #128763596 as per your suggestions and provided feedback to the editor to avoid such mistakes in the future edits.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi MxxCon,

Thank you for reviewing our change set and highlighting the issue. We have made the necessary changes in #128767922 as per your suggestions and provided feedback to the editor to avoid such mistakes in the future edits.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

We apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs, we always confine our edits to small geographical location. This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue.

Going forward, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors. Thanks again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

We apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs, we always confine our edits to small geographical location. This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue.

Going forward, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors. Thanks again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs, we always confine our edits to small geographical location. This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue.

Going forward, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors. Thanks again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

I apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies, for incorrect road modification and highway tag.

This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors again.
Thank you once again for providing the feedback, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

We apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and making the necessary changes. Apologies, for the incorrect road classification.

Going forward, I'll ensure to not mark roads as track roads in such scenarios.
Thank you once again for providing the feedback, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

We apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit.

Apologies for incorrect road digitization. It's an honest mistake from our end. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again.

Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
silakshm

Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit.
Apologies for the incorrect road digitization. Going forward I'll ensure to check for the latest aerial imagery before making any edits.

Thank you once again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
silakshm