Oh sorry, dann habe ich den Artikel wohl falsch verstanden! Machen wir's rückgängig!

Hallo
https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-giga-berlin-street-sign/
😉

Yes that would make sense - a relation on the path as a hiking route. That's been implemented for the Te Araroa (not sure whether it's been done for the whole trail).

Yes ok, I don't mind removing the names. A description of some sort might be useful though.

I'm with you on that one and I would also prefer to have a different feature type available for routes over tracks (paths) to make a better distinction. (Footpath is probably rather applied in urban environments and wouldn't fit here). Might be worth a suggestion. I admit, the Cokayne descent is probably borderline.

Hi, you're right, these are routes with little visible track on the ground apart from a few cairns and some visible track in places (which is due to the type of rocky ground and often snow cover in this terrain - I assume you have walked the tracks?). However, that's exactly what the purpose of the 'Trail Visibility' tag is: The tag should be set to 'Bad: no markers, path sometimes invisible/pathless'. Hence, the bad path visibility does not justify a delete. The path is being walked albeit not marked by DoC (DoC rarely marks routes above the grass line). Having the route marked in the map adds value to other users in the sense that it provides orientation for a walkable route. Therefore, please restore the deleted features. Please also make yourself familiar with the community's code of conduct - not to delete other people's work without getting in contact and discussing the map features prior.

The paths in question do exists. They are commonly used tracks. Tracks were recorded on the ground. Please restore.