fence inside waterway? oscm chek problem overlapping barrier and waterway not possible. Please check.

I hope, I had fixed all.

Hello,
Many Thanks.
Correct, I will fix it.

Thank you for fixing the tags !

Hello,

Thank you. Correct, should be name:en.
was already fixed by user mueschel.

Thank you,
I will use it from now on.

Hi,
I checked some other sources outside OSM. Even "Survey of India" (www.surveyofindia.gov.in) uses this type of letters with macron at its "englisch" maps.

Hi, many thanks!
Feel free to change, if you know the correct spelling. The documents I use are using this "macrons" at the "real" name (i.e. exported data from geonames.nga.mil - old variant and patially old india survey maps). I do not know, what is the correct spelling only in latin letters, maybe "a" with macron is "aa" or "e" something else in pure latin chars. So what I do, is using this name from source as the "name" tag, but always adding seplleing with only latin at the name:en tag (english).

hi,
I asked myself the same thing when I changed there.
there were 2 objects/ways ID:205729455 and ID:100497100 for Farakka Barrage. I didn't change it because I wasn't sure why, too.
dam ID 100497100 was created by PlaneMad changeset #7334148 13 years ago, dam with ID 205729455 was created by Japa 11 years ag (changeset #15048310)
regards

Hello Shel_Sri,
Sorry. I checked the changeset too and also couldn't find the missing route. Maybe I was too quick with my comment to you.
Maybe I accidentally removed the route myself.
Thanks sfrank.

Hello,
It seems you removed the highway part from the MDR225 route relation (relation no. 14136594). I have fixed it, but be careful at your next editings or comment it, if you did it intentionally.

Hello!
Thanks for the comment.
Was wrong tag spelling.
Must be crane:mobile = work_site, I fixed it.

Hallo Baßtölpel,
soweit ich das sehe (Maxar, Bing imagery) sind die beiden Freileitungen korrekt getaggt. Daneben sind 2 Objekte, die ich nicht genau deuten kann. Eines davon wurde mit man_made=tower von robram2004 (Änderungssatz 71151336) schon vor mir getaggt (stammt also nicht von mir).
Dem Schatten nach sehen die beiden wie Antennenmasten oder sowas aus ...
Aus meiner Sicht kann das aber gerne umgetagggt werden. Eine minor-line ist ja direkt daneben ..

Hallo,
Danke für den Hinweis. Habe es entfernt. Ist wohl bei der JOSM Autovervollständigen Funktion irgendwie rein gerutscht.
Frank

Hello! Thank you for the comment.
I have fixed the tags with the wrong spelling.

Hallo, Danke für den Hinweis.
Hatte mich vertippt, war der Name vom GNS. Jetzt fefixt.

Hi,
Thank you for your comment. I uploaded the change right now. Sometimes it is not easy to find a good tag name.
geetings from germany

Hi,
Thank you for fixing. I didnt erecognize it until now that I used wrong tag. Sure, right tag is name:oc

OK, danke. Ich wollte das "nichteinfachso" ändern, da ich nicht genau weiss, warum das so getaggt wurde.

Hallo,

ich war grade im Urlaub da und OsmAnd+ hat weder die Bahnübergänge angesagt /angezeigt noch wurden die Gleise angezeigt. ich würde vorschlagen statt railway:preserved lieber railway:rail und railway:preserved=yes verwenden wollen. (siehe dazu osm.wiki/DE:Tag:railway=preserved; osm.wiki/DE:Key:railway:preserved und osm.wiki/DE:Railways die Tabelle.