Hi! I see that you modified the Cavite-Batangas boundary to "follow mountains". Do you have a source such as a Republic Act or something else that specifies that the boundary actually follows ridgelines?

Question: Do you hide non-road features or only download roads? For example: when you split Loyola Street to add road-related tags in this changeset, you inadvertently broke two boundary relations.

Tip: When splitting a closed coastline that also has a place=island/islet tag, don't forget to create a multipolygon relation for the island and transfer the island-related tags from the split coastline ways to the relation.

See: relation/12688075

I partially reverted this changeset because it mistakenly included TS Cruz's perimeter into the Las Piñas relation.

I have reverted this changeset because it mistakenly included the whole TS Cruz perimeter into BF Homes Almanza's relation.

I think this is incorrect. This relation you created includes the municipalities of San Vicente, Dumaran, and Araceli and not just Roxas.

Hmmm. I previously modified the Palawan relation to exclude Puerto Princesa because the city is a HUC and is therefore outside the jurisdiction of the province despite being its capital.

This changeset turned a long waterway (way/27663262) into a culvert. Probably around 98% of this waterway is not actually covered or underground.

This changeset deleted the Philippine baselines and I have reverted it here: changeset/99905587

Should this be discussed with the wider community? Personally I prefer leaving out any "Street" suffixes. And consumers can use heuristics to assume that any road name without a street-like suffix like "Avenue" or "Boulevard" to have "Street" as the implied suffix. (But need to take care of special cases like "Paseo de Roxas" in Makati which does have a Spanish prefix. Or the "Calles" in Taal, Batangas.)

This has been reverted here: changeset/99077115

Reason: Municipal waters (R.A. 8550) is part of the jurisdiction of LGUs.

Also partially reverted here: changeset/99019678

This has been reverted here: changeset/99018564

Reason: Municipal waters (R.A. 8550) is part of the jurisdiction of LGUs.

This has been reverted here: changeset/99017055

Reason: Municipal waters (R.A. 8550) is part of the jurisdiction of LGUs.

This changeset is reverted here: changeset/99011722

Municipal waters is included in the jurisdiction of LGUs as stated in
R.A. 8550.

See discussion on Skyscrapercity. QBEx's status is still unclear

https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/quezon-bicol-expressway.1904233/page-13

Changeset tag is wrong: "Lapu-Lapu" should be "Mandaue"

Changeset tag is wrong: "Lapu-Lapu" should be "Mandaue"

Changeset tag is wrong: "Lapu-Lapu" should be "Mandaue"

Changeset tag is wrong: "Lapu-Lapu" should be "Mandaue"