I just fixed it again. changeset/141431235

Why did you undo the changes I had made to the New Road/Old Alfred Road/Alfred Road intersection? The ESRI Claraity imagery that you used is much older than the ESRI world imagery used in my changeset. changeset/104461701#map=13/43.4703/-70.6009

Please do not add crossings to stop sign nodes. They should be separate nodes.

Why did you rename a bunch of Route 1 to "Atlantic Highway"? The addresses from the Wiscasset bridge (way/101822087) to node/7549644393 all are "Route 1". way/327813286 seems to actually be named "Atlantic Highway" based on the addresses. The next thing on route 1 that I can see as being called Atlantic Highway is node/7159532946 all the way in Waldoboro.

Why did you add way/1100653702 and way/1100653702? They are in a closed off area, and at the least should be marked access=private or no. Did you survey this area? You don't have any sources listed in your changeset comment.

and way/556609157?

Why did you edit way/556609157 and not connect it to paths. It is a construction zone right now anyway, so the aerial imagery that you used was not a good source.

Why did you add way/1163980497?

What is the network=lcn on way/931237893

Why did you change the eastern prom trail (way/30769469) to a cycleway?

why did you change the Eastern Prom tral (way/30769469) to a footway?

That was not a foot way that was a path. The no. Bicycle sign is for the highway on ramp. Not for the path. Also, if you looked at the way you would see that it was already tagged in a bicycle relation. The ways that I deleted were going underneath the north side of tukeys bridge. There is no path there.

Why did you create the fence way/1127944897 to cross the existing path, when in reality it does not cross the path, but runs parallel?

why did you create way/1127944907 and way/1127944886? They do not exist.

And why are you creating crosswalks as footways (e.g. way/1125535216, way/1125535217, way/1125535229)? They should be footway=crossing and
highway=footway

Why did you tag way/131818344 as a footway? It had been tagged as a path (available to bicycles as well) with local knowledge as a source.

Why did you add way/1125535205? There is no path.

Any comment?

Why did you change Hunnewell Avenue to "track" https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/11473004 ? It is clearly a residential road. A surface tag may have been appropriate, but not highway=track

It crosses another path without connection as it is.

Did you survey this path?