Ceci n'est pas un hôtel.

Reverted in changeset/189834260

Reverted in changeset/189375499. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers.

Removed in changeset/189361046 due to promotional description and invalid tags. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers.

Hello there, we already have a “Sandra Clark Funeral Home” probably misplaced up near the Texaco and last edited by a user with a very similar name. Which name do you want to use?

thanks peter

Thanks!

Hi there, on Esri looks like it could be a putting green. Should those not be mapped / wrong tags used?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188202224

Imagery was NOT actually used to make this edit.

Reverted in changeset/187002493. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers.

Unfortunately the alleys should stay on OSM if they exist on the ground. We can tag them better and mark them as private, but it’s incorrect to completely delete them.

You sure? From aerials I can see vehicles and carports along the alleys. Also, private roads are allowed on OSM: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Proposal: readd them as alleys (they were not actually tagged as such earlier) and add access=private.

Hi there, are you absolutely sure this bike parking was removed? I used it a couple days before you made this changeset. It can be hard to see from the street since they put carts or other displays in front of it.

Hi there and welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contribution. It looks like you accidentally dragged a node in your changeset, which I have undone in changeset/186844524. This is a very easy mistake to make, so don't worry too much about it, just be sure to check for warnings on the save dialog in the future.

nice

Reverted in changeset/186677365. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers.

Hi there, I've reverted this in changeset/186676899. Since this building has multiple tenants, your practice should be put on a separate node rather than on the building itself. However in this case we already have DHAT mapped at node/8252836281 and I don't think it's worth having each provider mapped out separately.

Reverted in changeset/186561575. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers.

Reverted in changeset/186561469. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers.

Reverted in changeset/186379824. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers

Request denied, reverted in changeset/186204633. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits.