schadow1's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 146140037 | almost 2 years ago | hi Timmy
|
| 128302102 | about 3 years ago | Thank you for removing the entrance block to Woodcress! |
| 122409886 | over 3 years ago | Hi Timmy Thanks for reaching out. This was based on the Philippine mapping convention where Access tags for roads are sufficient enough on barriers before for (1) redundancy and (2)personally it looks ugly on OSM standard map style with dashes on the roads. Where access should be recognized by routing engines instead of being in the map. Apparently this was modified in Sept 2020 and I was not able to challenge it due to being busy with other things. (3) Also access=private seems to be used on a very strict level where signage must mention no trespassing or no entry for other vehicles access=*#Road_with_restricted_access (4) Another, the compiler script we use for Garmin PH maps since 2009 makes access=private unroutable Personally, barriers with access tag plus roads with another access tag makes it obsessively redundant and that modern routing engines should be sufficient enough to detect the barrier access. For specificity on Camella Bucandala 4, they are not that strict regarding vehicle access, though. Access=permissive (as the guards can allow access on certain times by outsiders if allowed or given homeowner approval) or losely access=destination
|
| 69162430 | over 6 years ago | Ends today Apr 21. Reverted 69417734 |
| 55117626 | almost 8 years ago | Same issue. Fixed it for your
|
| 55092236 | almost 8 years ago | Made fixes. Please do not duplicate buildings on top of each other. Do not map an area with multiple buildings into a single building. Please terrace buildings if mapping multiple units within a building. Or easier, to just add a node within the building that tags the establishments.
|
| 55115832 | almost 8 years ago | Hello. Buildings are not mapped on top of each other. If there are separate units, you either terrace them or place an address node on top of it. Please let me know if your organization needs assistance on training for mapping conventions.
|
| 55005128 | almost 8 years ago | Thanks for mapping. Although, please use building=house for residential structures. landuse tags is for a wide area purposes.
If you need any assistance for training of your organization, please let me know so I can assist. This has been fixed
|
| 48960741 | almost 8 years ago | please tag houses as building=house and omit landuse=residential as the landuse tag is used for a wide area for residential units.
Fixed it on changeset
|
| 54924272 | almost 8 years ago | Fixed on changeset changeset/54999848 Although you can still provide more specific details on the hydrants by referrin to the tag information I posted previously. |
| 54924272 | almost 8 years ago | Thanks for mapping. Although this is how to tag fire hydrants and not as "drinking water"
|
| 54923532 | almost 8 years ago | Thanks for mapping. Please do not map a whole block as a single building. |
| 54792688 | about 8 years ago | heart-heart |
| 54654192 | about 8 years ago | You just missed this part. Made revisions
|
| 54653969 | about 8 years ago | You just missed this part. Made revisions
|
| 54643830 | about 8 years ago | Thanks for refining the buildings footprints. However, please do not delete the available address data in the process of doing it. Let me know if you need assistance on editing nodes instead of deleting the whole structures. |
| 41082167 | about 8 years ago | OMG! Fixing it now. Probably had an error with JOSM literally tagging them as <different>
|
| 52604708 | about 8 years ago | Extracted from freepublicwifi.gov.ph under the department of information communications and technology (DICT)
|
| 52258657 | over 8 years ago | Gotcha :) |
| 52258657 | over 8 years ago | Got it here. But I misspelled too. Should be "width:lanes" Which is best to use for this matter? |