This role with inner/outer is something I recently found in one of the instruction pages where it is specifically said to use those two - I have to find that bit as I am unable to remember from top of my head where this instruction is stated. However, I will use your suggestions to make it better, and I will try to use validator which I never used before.

Mario, I followed those instructions to the letter. It is very much possible that I am making a mistake in some regard, but than again I did not spare an effort to look around, to check some examples and I asure you that I would like my mapping to be as correct and precise as possible. I am content with your suggestions and I won't make any further changes until we sort this out properly - the only thing that bothers me is that we lead this discussion via these comment sections, it would be better if we could discuss it in little bit more appropriate place. I will look now what you are saying above and reply if needed; I will try to incorporate your remarks if possible or if I find out how. Thanks and stay in touch.

Also, Key:heritage gives very clear instructions on creation of relations for protected heritage - maybe I am wrong or misunderstand some aspects of its instructions, but it clearly explains how boundary and protected area are used as tags in many situations.

Hi, Mario, I am a bit confused because it says that "boundary" should be used in admin-political cases but also "nature protection and similar boundaries", and since I usually create "similar boundaries" by mapping heritage protection "sites" and entire "zones" which include not only building multi-polygons but also surroundings, and such places in topographical terms do not differ from zones of "nature protection and similar boundaries", I thought it can be tagged as "boundary" - another reason for choosing "boundary and "protected area" for such relations is that this is the only configuration that I am able to set up that then could be rendered with "map frame" on Wikipedia. I am not sure who "corrected" these 3 or 4 relations that I created in last few days, but these are completely dismantled and as such irrelevant for the reason they were created in the first place as "protected heritage zones", and above all I am now practically in fear of turning myself into pariah if I try to recreate those to give them back some sense. For example, what the heck is this now: relation/17674019/history/3 - it's nothing without the building; only building and the area surrounding it in relation has some meaning as a protected heritage zone. Sorry, this is a long reply so I will stop here, though I have few more points to share.

Follow the link that is labeled "stećak", I have created extensive description page on that Key. Thanks.

Hello, K73, I received your message, so I wanted to thank you - those useful inputs.

Hello, have you not reverted my edits already? In any case, I did not delete that node, but instead I moved it to a location where I tried to make Relation:Mediterranean with two polygons (Mediterranean West and Mediterranean East), however, I temporarily suspended the works because I was not sure if I could make such large polygons quickly and easily, that is, whether it is possible to make them at all. As far as I can see Node has been in its original place since you reverted me, so I’m not sure I have anything else to revert - if you think something other than that needs to be fixed, feel free to do whatever you think should be done.

Easy pal with these aggressive "vandalism" labels! It was rather a "good faith" attempt on my part to create two polygons for "western" and "eastern" Mediterranean, and then to placed them under relation as Mediterranean Sea.

Easy pal with these aggressive "vandalism" labels! It was rather a "good faith" attempt on my part to create two polygons for "western" and "eastern" Mediterranean, and then to placed them under relation as Mediterranean Sea.

(Ja mislim da govorimo isti jezik) OK, nema problema. Da li ti znaš kako se radi u ovoj mapi i kako se barata ovim raznim veličinama u odnosu na Wiki-data?