This is a great edit demonstrating how openstreetmap is successful, and how editors can work together for the map. Thank you aharvey.

If we are able to do something like that, it would clear my concerns entirely: any failed inheritance would be from a lack of the way controller being adequately specified. (CoS on Parking for example tries desperately to remind people that it doesn't control a variety of streets)

I get concerned about inherited properties where our typology and the external authorities typologies don't match. My concern doesn't mean that it is improper. A better match would be road-type residential && controller CoS for example if we're going to work inheritance regularly.

It also exposes problems like Collins Street residential being the terminator of the Epsom Road / Huntley St rat run; or Doody Street Tertiary versus Doody Street residential for no good reason.

How does this edit control for State controlled roads and non-LGA controlled roads in the LGA that are marked by OSM as residential?

I can't find the CoS announcement or on their website, but CoS park steele habitually note bicycle=yes as "non-road related area" bicycle access in the controlled space.

I’m mobile right now. I will attend to this change set within 48 hours.

I resurveyed 10 months ago. Next time I’m shifted for bicycle I can resurvey if you like.

Nope. The regs specify as heading towards it past a sign or marking up until a cease sign.

https://www.woollahra.nsw.gov.au/files/assets/public/v/1/services/documents/cycle-route-map.pdf

There's no commentary here about your deletion of existing paths and ways such as 305523587

good work!

Cheers! It feels awesome when another mapper beats you, I love the feeling!

I note that most australian doorzones would be :buffered=-1.5

Thank you for your advice; Given the specificity of the hazard with the way type or way subtype I concurr with your c:l:d=yes/no/alt schema. I will manually undo my actions within the week. Chur!

0.70 m lanes entirely within the hazardous extension of a normally parked car door isn't actually consumeable data via cycleway=lane. cycleway=no may be a more realistic consumeable data. Sending someone down Edgecliff Road with the belief they'll have a bit of paint they can 'safely' ride behind is somewhat dubious when it gets as narrow as 0.50 m entirely within door swing.

I'd eagerly like to know what best practice ought to be. A certain data consumer should probably mark this grade of infra in brown.

Thank you for reviewing the most recent images. Aerial isn't always most valuable. Thank you for checking mapillary and your own.

Oh look here: node/4094611856
mapillary tag: vnPGfRGaxIQ14mtfzIMc2g
mapillary imagery: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=vnPGfRGaxIQ14mtfzIMc2g&lat=-33.882305555555554&lng=151.202225&z=17

would sincerely appreciate your revert on the deleted nodes.

I surveyed those benches in person mate

I’m here for the deprecated dog defecation bins. It’s an amusing sound in en_Au

Last time I was through here was within the last month, and not to my recollection (as I was forced through the industrial park to Parramatta road. But that may have been signage or routing, as I wasn't looking for this way's status.