Hello Andy,

Thank you for replying and also reaching out to the user. At the moment we have corrected the errors and are keeping an eye out for the same in the future, if this continues, we'll reach out to you and the Data Working Group for help. Thanks again

Hello sgmapperhh,

I'm from the Grab Data team, while mapping in Singapore, we came across few of your edits (Eg: way/658174809, way/481114110). We were not able identify these roads neither via the satellite imagery nor the OpenStreetCam imagery. Can you help us understand the source you have used or referred while mapping these roads.

Thank you,
sai_sri

Hi angys,

Any update on this ?

Thank you,
sai_sri

Hi dianawa_22,

Thank you for the quick response and will definitely approach you in case of anything.

Thakns,
sai_sri

Hi dianawa_22,

While working near Padang,ID i have came across some of your edits where all the roads are marked as Unclassified.

As that of Satellite Imagery i can clearly confirm that these are all Track roads.
way/524873607
way/524873604
way/524873616
way/524873859
way/524873579

It would be great help if you share me any link where i can differentiate roads based on policies you referred.

Thanks,
sai_sri.

Hi angys,

As per osm wiki, a highway is tagged as unclassified if road is Public access and non-residential.
In general, unclassified is of lower priority than tertiary and non-residential.
highway=unclassified.
but in this scenario way/314089687,way 314089690,way 314089701,way 314089676,way 637925782,way 314089684 roads are leading to residential buildings. Hence the classification should be residential and not unclassified. Please suggest otherwise.

Thanks,
sai_sri.