rudychung's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 172982959 | 3 months ago | Thanks @旧加卷 for your kindly reminder. Would follow your suggestion. |
| 160893505 | about 1 year ago | Thanks, mueschel. ^^ What is the key of the strange tag? |
| 160893505 | about 1 year ago | It would be great. Thank you very much. ^^ |
| 160893505 | about 1 year ago | Sure, no problem. I would find a time in these two weeks to make the correction. Thank you for your kindly reminder. ^^ |
| 156940978 | about 1 year ago | Hi, user_5359, you need to ask Supaplex. These two tags were added from the very beginning. ^^ |
| 151632466 | over 1 year ago | 嗯嗯,瞭解,只是怕有看漏了,導致兩邊編輯衝突了。 謝謝說明喔! ^^ |
| 151632466 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Innertia, 我發現這五個 peaks 都重複了,變成每個 peak 都兩個 nodes。就保留原來的 nodes (因為比較都資訊 tags),把你的刪除了。 向榮 (2482557203),v5
不確定為何你沒看到原來的點位。如果有疑問的話,請跟我說。謝謝! ^^ Sincerely,
|
| 145375411 | about 2 years ago | OK. Got it.
|
| 134203211 | over 2 years ago | Hey Yves, Apologies for getting back to you late, I just returned from an awesome 6-day hiking trip! 😄 I appreciate your concern about the tagging. Here's a link for you to check out: https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/posts/2016085291790263/ Feel free to let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thanks a lot! Sincerely,
|
| 128709377 | about 3 years ago | Got it. Thank you!
|
| 115672303 | about 4 years ago | 謝謝你的檢查。我會找建忠兄針對他的資料查驗。再回頭來改 OSM 上的資料。 |
| 115672303 | about 4 years ago | Hi, @Arumi0601, got it. |
| 112398572 | about 4 years ago | Done. XD |
| 112398572 | about 4 years ago | 原來是這樣,了解。我來把 naming 恢復原狀. ^^ |
| 67049762 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 44619463 | about 9 years ago | Welcome, Lee Lin san! :D |
| 41633307 | over 9 years ago | Hi chihchun, 你好,很高興認識你。 我沒有新增任何 node,我只有對目前已經存在的 node 來新增 tags。 新增 tags 的方式,我是參考 WiKi page (man_made=survey_point)。 如果有所不妥的地方,請告知。我願意發時間再更正。謝謝! Rudy 8/24 |
| 41527821 | over 9 years ago | Hi Supaplex, thank you for your comments and introductions. It is very useful. There are many social websites you introduced, which one do you think is most suitable for discussion? Thanks again! ^^ Rudy 8/24 |