robw's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 139446635 | over 2 years ago | The area is in a continual state of change due to the ongoing HS2 works and once they have settled down the "mess" can get sorted out. and the bus relations fixed once the buses have worked out where they are actually going.. |
| 100542700 | almost 5 years ago | Ha. The police have even less understanding of the signage regulations than you do. But as you keep being very keen in pointing out, just because something is not signposted doesn't mean is it is a safe (not: not illegal) manoeuver.
|
| 100542700 | almost 5 years ago | And do you have a name? Or should I continue referring to you as #5589 - at least that makes a change from number 6. |
| 100542700 | almost 5 years ago | Oh you really are a giggle.
|
| 100542700 | almost 5 years ago | Ooh, but you have identified a problem with the signage at this roundabout - it is not actually signposted as a roundabout at all! I went past an hour or so ago and there are none of the required signs to indicate that it should be traversed in a specific direction, therefore actually mapping it as one-way is incorrect. Do you want to fix this or shall I? |
| 100542700 | almost 5 years ago | Yep. You are still ranting. I guess you don't have a day job as if you did and your spoke to co-workers like you do on here, then you soon would not. If you ask politely for an explanation of what I have done or indicate an error and ask me to fix it then I am far more likely to respond positively. As you have asked about "the signposting of lane restrictions on the A452", then sorry but I can't see any - and as you are very keen on mapping every single signpost you don't seem to be able to see any either. |
| 100542700 | almost 5 years ago | Wow. What a rant. |
| 100542700 | almost 5 years ago | Thanks ndrw6. I have indeed added some turn implicit turn restrictions would should address #5589's comments. If s/he had been a little more civil in the opening remarks then I would probably not have responded in such a terse manner. I have also reviewed the other local interchanges which I have recently similary modified to remove non-existant ways and have now add in implicit restrictions where appropriate. |
| 100542700 | almost 5 years ago | Sorry but as previously mapped there were multiple non-existant ways shown. As now mapped all the islands actually present on the ground are correct. Only turn restrictions which are signposted as "not allowed" should actually be mapped as otherwise it is just a matter of opinion what is or is not allowed. Apologies if i mapped up the gritting route relation - consider it an opportunity for you to fix it.
|
| 100288234 | almost 5 years ago | Actually I shortened the lenght of the tunnel as previously marked as it went further north. If you think it is still incorrect I suggest you go and visit it and check. |
| 78190542 | about 6 years ago | If that's the case then apologies. I'll try to find who did the change. |
| 78190542 | about 6 years ago | Bit misleading really marking the huntingdon viaduct as removed since it's still there, just closed. Equally the old bits of the A14 (will be A1307) are not "under construction", they are still there, just closed. The only bits "under construction" are really the new link roads either side of the viaduct. |
| 72168774 | over 6 years ago | Point taken. Have put it like it will be when it's finished - no less misleading in the meanwhile than what was there, but will be correct when they have finished - at least until they move on to the next set of changes. |
| 64220406 | about 7 years ago | Fixed. |
| 52238628 | over 8 years ago | Dont think is a real problem as for example the A14 huntigdon-cambridge upgrade was shown on OSM far before any work commenced on the ground. |
| 52238628 | over 8 years ago | Without going to have a look I can't confirm. But this is what seems to have been decided and it is supposed to start about now, so may still only be planned (as per my comment). Clearly it's not yet open so nothing is going to be using it for routing. |
| 50102946 | over 8 years ago | Source docs at http://www.pembrokeshire.gov.uk/content.asp?id=28112&nav=838&parent_directory_id=646 are unclear. Will removed the (Old) for now and add a note. |
| 43846545 | about 9 years ago | Because that is the main route to/from the A45 towards Ryton & onwards. I've been looking at the wiki about this, and the only agreement is that there is no agreement.... |
| 33301083 | over 10 years ago | Sounds good to me.
|
| 33301083 | over 10 years ago | If you think that is obvious enough then fine. |