OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
175598323 about 2 months ago

Hi, is there still a shop there? Then it would be better not to delete the shop node, but to add a disused: prefix to it. osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

175544907 about 2 months ago

You should know that OpneStreetMap is actually not a map but a database of map data that can be used by different map makers to make maps. The standard map on the OSM website is called Carto, and doesn't display sports clubs and health workers. That's Carto's choice and we can't do much about it. But they are there in the database, so a map maker that wants to show sports clubs will show it. By the way, I think shop=beauty is a better tag for Център за здраве и красота Леда

175530308 about 2 months ago

Thanks for the work you put in this! However I think the area you created contains both taxiways and aprons: these should be separate areas. See osm.wiki/Aeroways
Are you sure the surface is asphalt? It is often hard to see the difference between asphalt and concrete

175446969 about 2 months ago

Agree, although quite likely the next mapper will be me visiting my mother-in-law for Christmas...

175414467 about 2 months ago

True, but it's typically used to tag texts on the object that are not the name of the object.

175305675 about 2 months ago

OK. I would use a clearer changeset comment, for instance "Added paths and roads to Sultan's Trail hiking route relation"
Nederlander?

175305675 about 2 months ago

Hi, I saw you made many edits in Sofia with changeset comment ST1, ST5 and ST7. What does ST stand for? What did you do?

175075073 2 months ago

I think you removed too many tags: i think it is good practice to keep at least the disused:shop= tag, so that apps like StreetComplete will highlight that a new shop may have started there. The name tag should have been kept too, as "some advertising elements still were there". Please revert your edit.

174981959 2 months ago

Last time I was there was in 2020 and it was already good then (see Kartaview), so I'll set the bit beyond the Iskar bridge to good as well. I sometimes use roads-bg to choose destinations for survey; fortunately there aren't that many smoothness=bad roads in Bulgaria any more!

174981959 2 months ago

I changed the smoothness of the sett bit to intermediate (good is rare, usually only for pedestrian paths). Hasn't the part just north-east of the bridge been improved as well?

172149710 3 months ago

agree. I chose fast_food because the food is ready (i.e. they don't start cooking it after you order), but it is indeed a cafetaria (or canteen)

172675204 4 months ago

When a business' address is different from that of the building it is in, then of course it should be added.
Also note shop=*#Address_information "Make sure to add address tags (or avoid adding them) in accordance with tagging practices used within the local community." i.e. it is accepted that there are local variations in tagging practices.

172675204 4 months ago

I think the page is this one osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
"An area object with a node object inside, both with the same tags representing the same real-world feature."
An address is a property of the building (or more correctly for Bulgaria: the land the building stands on), so it should be added to the building (the "real-world feature" it belongs to) and only to the building.

172675204 4 months ago

I'm not an IT specialist, but I understand that it's easy for software to derive the address of a business from the address of the building the node for it is in. That some software doesn't do this well is a fault of that software, not of OSM.
In Bulgaria the consensus is to add addresses to the building area. In other countries, the OSM community reached a consensus to add it to separate nodes that only have the address. The information for a business then contains only the info for that business but not the address, to prevent that if the business disappears and is deleted, the address is also deleted.
There is also a consensus that the address is added either to the building or to a node, not to both. See osm.wiki/Mapping_addresses_as_separate_nodes_or_by_adding_to_building_polygons

172675204 4 months ago

Thanks for adding this and other businesses to the map! However we have a habit of adding addresses only to buildings, and not again on nodes within those buildings. So if you add a business in a building which already has an address, it's not necessary to add the address again.

172123287 4 months ago

added fences and retaining wall now. There's even a Частна собственост sign, I saw today.

172118041 4 months ago

Hi, thanks for your edits! Are you sure that for this node node/3672217864 that is the name of the cafe, and not the name of the brand of coffee they are selling?

172123287 4 months ago

I should have mapped the fence... and I think there's also access to the parking garage under the building after the lift gate

172123287 4 months ago

It is fenced now

172089215 4 months ago

Thanks for your revert of the construction status of that motorway: it is under repair, but probably not worth mapping that as it's temporary.
I did revert your edits west of the junction with the ring road, however. There's been a discussion about the motorway status of the section east of the ring road https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/motorway-status-of/122136 but west of it, it's definitely not a motorway