Thanks.

If you watch the history at way/1560305370/history you see that it was not me who tagged these ways as track.

And the way which appears as deleted was caused by merging of segments of the same road.

You duplicated existing ways. Please stop using MapWIthAI without checking the existing data. Reverted.

You have duplicated ways, which already existed. Therefore I reverted this changeset. Please stop using MAPWithAI without checking existing data.

This MAPWith slop edits duplicated existing ways multiple times. I reported them to DWG asking for revert.

This change looks strange. What is the purpose of way/1551442040#map=19/22.839908/87.973256 ? If there really is no connection please add the tag noexit=yes to node/14111613421 and node/14111613422

I'm sorry, I missed this comment because I was on holiday when you wrote it.

Please re-check the new ways you added. These need to be checked and re-tagged. highway=trunk definitely seems to be wrong. See highway=trunk

Additionally, way way/1085880566#map=17/46.452231/30.635788 does not take the previously already existing ways into account. This ways probably needs to be removed altogether.

Hello,

please check the nodes changeset/187314286 and node/14088886084#map=19/42.651570/-73.761794 for connectivity. The new mapping does not make sense there.

Please use a better changeset comment. Which view of the OSM inspector did you use?

Veuillez utiliser un meilleur commentaire pour le jeu de modifications. Quelle vue de l'OSM Inspector avez-vous utilisée ?

If you want to map a bicycle route please use existing way segments and don't create an overlapping extremely long new way. For the sake of keeping the data consistent, I reverted this changeset.

Sorry, no, I cannot confirm that these ways are highways.

I care about the connectivity of highways such that routing application can work properly. I always check for plausibility taking the background imagery into regard, but usually I don't convert highways to something else like hedges or whatever in doubtful situations.

So this is the reason that I appear as last editor of the ways you observed.

Sorry, I just connected the construction road and I have no possibility to verify situation on the ground.

Thank you @woodpeck for blocking this user for 14 days. From my perspective it is a pretty long time, but it might help in getting the user more cooperative.
Usually I would clean up the unconnected ways in this period, but in this case I won't do this. Instead I leave this exercise to @joedal-osm to do it himself when his block ends.

Google translate for French:
Merci à @woodpeck d'avoir bloqué cet utilisateur pour une durée de 14 jours. À mon avis, c'est une période assez longue, mais cela pourrait l'inciter à faire preuve de plus de coopération.
D'ordinaire, je profiterais de ce laps de temps pour nettoyer les chemins déconnectés, mais je ne le ferai pas cette fois-ci. Je laisse plutôt le soin à @joedal-osm d'effectuer ce travail lui-même une fois son blocage levé.

Please stop your not discussed import!
As I expect you not to answer again, I'm going to report you to DWG again.
This looks better than last time, still again there are a lot of unconnected ways: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-3.94596&lat=7.42883&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

Via google translate:
Veuillez cesser votre importation non concertée!
Comme je ne m'attends pas à une nouvelle réponse de votre part, je vais à nouveau vous signaler au DWG.
Cela semble meilleur que la dernière fois, mais il reste tout de même de nombreux tronçons non connectés : https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-3.94596&lat=7.42883&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

Please stop tagging existing higher classified roads into living_street.

Sorry, this was a mistake. Thanks for detecting and repairing!

I already reported this user two times to the DWG, asking for an 0 hours block, but I didn't get an answer yet.
I analyzed the changesets a bit and detected that the user uploaded exactly the same data with 3 days in between.
Please don't start fixing the data. I believe the DWG needs to do a professional revert here.

I deleted the obviously wrong stuff.

Please answer if way/1519715468#map=17/44.272971/8.170892 is fiction or real. I left this hoping for an honest answer

Please stop making such obviously wrong test edits!

Thank you!

Hi, please stop uploading such incredibly long new ways! I reverted this changeset.