Due to the huge amount of errors and to avoid more conflicts by waiting I reverted this changeset in osm.org/changeset/163971565#map=13/49.26570/18.83303

Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

In deiner ersten Änderung hast du einige offensichtliche Fehler in die Daten eingebaut. Ein paar Wege sind jetzt nämlich nicht mehr verbunden. Siehe https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=7.03063&lat=51.49340&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

Da du keinen Kommentar hinterlassen hast was Sinn und Zweck dieser Änderungen gewesen sein soll ist schwierig abzuschätzen was die Intention war. Es wurden jedenfalls gleich 31 Relationen verändert, was für eine erste Änderung angesichts der Fehler in den Daten jetzt nach meinem Empfinden zu viele Änderungen auf einmal sind.

Kannst du bitte beschreiben was du damit erreichen wolltest? Siehst du dich in der Lage diese Fehler auszubessern?

Falls dem nicht der Fall sein sollte tendiere ich diese Änderung vollständig rückgängig zu machen.

Danke
ratrun

As requested in your private message tried to help you out. I deleted all the new way tagged with highway=busway and converted one of it (Walmart/Mercy Bus Route Pt. 2) into a bus route relation, see osm.org/relation/18816825 as an example such that you can see how this is done properly.

Please note that adding route relations in OSM is cumbersome and not the first thing I would recommend a new user to do. Please also note that the ID editor is said to be cumbersome and even buggy when it comes to support for complex route relations as these are. I'm sorry, I cannot help you with instructions for editing relations in ID as I'm using JOSM and don't have any experience with ID.

I did this edit such that you can learn how to do it and hope that you'll try to add the other routes for which I had to delete the data.
BR
ratrun

Hi and welcome to OSM,

you used a wrong mapping method for adding these bus routes. Bus routes need to be mapped as relations, but you added new ways of highway type busway, which is wrong. Do you feel comfortable to correct that? Please check the OSM wiki at osm.wiki/wiki/Buses.

In case that you don't feel comfortable in making the required changes please inform me if I can help you by reverting your changes such that you don't need to do this manually.

thanks

ratrun

Sorry, ja, ich hätte vielleicht nachfragen können aber ich habe gesehen dass du dich noch nicht so viel gempped hast und einen typischen Anfängerfehler gemacht hast. Das ist OK, jeder macht Fehler am Anfang. Ich wollte dir nur die Arbeit des Löschens abnehmen, weil das sowieso notwendig war. Ich hoffe dass ich dich nicht vergrault habe damit.

Wenn das Tagging der bestehenden Wege nicht passt, dann ist die korrekte Vorgangsweise die Tags an diesen zu verändern und nicht zusätzliche Duplikat Wege anzulegen. Bitte berücksichte das bei zukunftigen Änderungen.
Danke!
ratrun

Hallo!

Das Hinzufügen der neuen zusätzlichen Wege war überflüssig, da die bestehenden Wege nicht integriert/überarbeitet wurden. Ich habe daher diesen Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht um die so entstandenen Fehler zu beseitigen.

Hi!

The data you added here is of very poor quality as you entered most of the ways multiple times without connecting the end nodes to the other ways. Therefore, it creates a couple of routing errors. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-71.40618&lat=46.83693&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=snap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

Please rework this edit and improve the data! This is what needs to be done:
- every physical way must be mapped only once!
- connect the end nodes of the ways to the other ways

thank you
ratrun

Hi and welcome to OSM,

please stop adding the name tag which are not names. E.g.
name=Footpath,Pavers is superfluous as these properties is no real name.

Please explain the source of you edits in more detail. To me theses edits look suspicious as they are creating unconnected ways in favor of dubious new data.

In the meantime the change is reverted by another user, see osm.org/changeset/161764790 . Please stop making fake edits, otherwise I need to report you to the data working group

Hi and welcome to OSM,

You made a couple of mistakes in your initial changesets. This particular one seems to be the worst. You created a motorway which ends in the middle of nowhere, which obviously does not seem right. Please use useful changeset comments and describe the source of your changes.

thank you
ratrun

Your edits are of very bad quality and your changeset titles "Update" are totally useless. Please provide the source of your edits.

Hi,
I'm also not from this area, but this edit seems wrong. Please explain the barrier of which you are talking in in the changeset comment. I doubt that it is possible to spot a barrier from an Esri World Imagery source.
The edit destroyed the routing and therefore I plan to revert this changeset if you do not provider better source references.

Hi,
you reverted my guessed fix, but now the dead end road starts out of the blue, which does not make any sense.

Please fix this obvious routing error
thanks
ratrun

Hi and welcome to OSM!

Please connect the end nodes of the ways with the junction node. You have created a lot of routing errors as the ways are now unconnected! See OSMI routing view: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-89.33779&lat=42.23967&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

Can you please fix the errors you have created?

Thank you for the information and your effort for cleaning the data.

Hi, please stop continuing with your current editor pattern. You are creating a lot of unconnected ways and therefore destroy routing capability. See the Openstreetmap Inspector routing view: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=20.44550&lat=44.53589&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1
Please fix the errors you have created. You need to merge the erroneous nodes to the crossing ways.

thanks

ratrun

Thank you for confirmation!

I now changed the names according to your instructions above, see osm.org/changeset/160947436#map=16/48.77957/2.09820

Please note that I didn't change the name yet for the segments further in the south here: osm.org/way/22675305#map=18/48.767370/2.068825
I used the search functionality of JOSM for the name replacement, but intentionally didn't apply the name change for these segments as they seem to be too far awway. Or shall I also change the name here?

Good luck with your JOSM attempt! I recommend watching an introduction video before starting. People say that JOSM is more difficult to use compared to ID, but for me the opposite is the case.

Sorry I can`t help you with instructions for ID as I'm not familiar with the ID web editor. I just use JOSM as it is much better. But I can perform the change for you if you like. Please give me instructions where to change the name. From your description it looks to me as if the name "Route de Dampierre" needs to be replaced on all the segments, such that there does not remain any segment with that name finally. Please confirm.