The huge amount of highway tags on nodes is just stupid. I would favor a revert of this whole changeset.

Hi,
can you please explain what this Piroozi Boulevard is? From the tagging it looks like a highway, but as it is not connected to the rest of the road network and there are already existing ways nearby this edit looks unrealistic to me.
An if this is still under construction then the highway=residential tag is wrong
thanks

ratrun

Hi @Mercy14846,

A ferry must be somehow connected to the road network in the surrounding, otherwise a ferry is useless as people are not able to enter it, not even by foot only.

If this is the case, there is the possibility to connect the ferries with so called informal ways osm.wiki/Tag:informal%3Dyes

From your writing I conclude that these ferries only transport people, no cars and other motor vehicles.

Maybe bicycles or mofas are also possible, I'm just guessing. Can you please answer these questions?

Hello,
as you seem to have local knowledge: can you please add the allowed transport to the ferries, see osm.wiki/Tag:route=ferry

Additionally, the ferry end points/ ferry_terminal are not connected to the road network, which prevents routing. See the errors detected by Openstreetmap inspector routing view https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=3.72509&lat=6.91597&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

Hello and welcome to OSM,

thank you for you contributions!

I stumbled across this change in this way:
osm.org/way/128573470#map=17/-37.214135/-72.386105

You tagged it with cycleway:left:oneway= -1 and cycleway:right:oneway=-1.

Could you please describe your motivation why you choose this tagging?

This tag combination does not make much sense. See osm.wiki/Key:cycleway:right:oneway

I want to understand how it came that you being a person new to OSM choose it such that we eventually can improve the description in our wiki.

I think that both these tags can be safely deleted.

Hi,
the two nodes in the north osm.org/node/12771048444 and osm.org/node/12660784502 were very close, but not connected. See osm.wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing why connections are important.

Due to the huge amount of errors and to avoid more conflicts by waiting I reverted this changeset in osm.org/changeset/163971565#map=13/49.26570/18.83303

Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

In deiner ersten Änderung hast du einige offensichtliche Fehler in die Daten eingebaut. Ein paar Wege sind jetzt nämlich nicht mehr verbunden. Siehe https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=7.03063&lat=51.49340&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

Da du keinen Kommentar hinterlassen hast was Sinn und Zweck dieser Änderungen gewesen sein soll ist schwierig abzuschätzen was die Intention war. Es wurden jedenfalls gleich 31 Relationen verändert, was für eine erste Änderung angesichts der Fehler in den Daten jetzt nach meinem Empfinden zu viele Änderungen auf einmal sind.

Kannst du bitte beschreiben was du damit erreichen wolltest? Siehst du dich in der Lage diese Fehler auszubessern?

Falls dem nicht der Fall sein sollte tendiere ich diese Änderung vollständig rückgängig zu machen.

Danke
ratrun

As requested in your private message tried to help you out. I deleted all the new way tagged with highway=busway and converted one of it (Walmart/Mercy Bus Route Pt. 2) into a bus route relation, see osm.org/relation/18816825 as an example such that you can see how this is done properly.

Please note that adding route relations in OSM is cumbersome and not the first thing I would recommend a new user to do. Please also note that the ID editor is said to be cumbersome and even buggy when it comes to support for complex route relations as these are. I'm sorry, I cannot help you with instructions for editing relations in ID as I'm using JOSM and don't have any experience with ID.

I did this edit such that you can learn how to do it and hope that you'll try to add the other routes for which I had to delete the data.
BR
ratrun

Hi and welcome to OSM,

you used a wrong mapping method for adding these bus routes. Bus routes need to be mapped as relations, but you added new ways of highway type busway, which is wrong. Do you feel comfortable to correct that? Please check the OSM wiki at osm.wiki/Buses.

In case that you don't feel comfortable in making the required changes please inform me if I can help you by reverting your changes such that you don't need to do this manually.

thanks

ratrun

Sorry, ja, ich hätte vielleicht nachfragen können aber ich habe gesehen dass du dich noch nicht so viel gempped hast und einen typischen Anfängerfehler gemacht hast. Das ist OK, jeder macht Fehler am Anfang. Ich wollte dir nur die Arbeit des Löschens abnehmen, weil das sowieso notwendig war. Ich hoffe dass ich dich nicht vergrault habe damit.

Wenn das Tagging der bestehenden Wege nicht passt, dann ist die korrekte Vorgangsweise die Tags an diesen zu verändern und nicht zusätzliche Duplikat Wege anzulegen. Bitte berücksichte das bei zukunftigen Änderungen.
Danke!
ratrun

Hallo!

Das Hinzufügen der neuen zusätzlichen Wege war überflüssig, da die bestehenden Wege nicht integriert/überarbeitet wurden. Ich habe daher diesen Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht um die so entstandenen Fehler zu beseitigen.

Hi!

The data you added here is of very poor quality as you entered most of the ways multiple times without connecting the end nodes to the other ways. Therefore, it creates a couple of routing errors. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-71.40618&lat=46.83693&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=snap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

Please rework this edit and improve the data! This is what needs to be done:
- every physical way must be mapped only once!
- connect the end nodes of the ways to the other ways

thank you
ratrun

Hi and welcome to OSM,

please stop adding the name tag which are not names. E.g.
name=Footpath,Pavers is superfluous as these properties is no real name.

Please explain the source of you edits in more detail. To me theses edits look suspicious as they are creating unconnected ways in favor of dubious new data.

In the meantime the change is reverted by another user, see osm.org/changeset/161764790 . Please stop making fake edits, otherwise I need to report you to the data working group

Hi and welcome to OSM,

You made a couple of mistakes in your initial changesets. This particular one seems to be the worst. You created a motorway which ends in the middle of nowhere, which obviously does not seem right. Please use useful changeset comments and describe the source of your changes.

thank you
ratrun

Your edits are of very bad quality and your changeset titles "Update" are totally useless. Please provide the source of your edits.

Hi,
I'm also not from this area, but this edit seems wrong. Please explain the barrier of which you are talking in in the changeset comment. I doubt that it is possible to spot a barrier from an Esri World Imagery source.
The edit destroyed the routing and therefore I plan to revert this changeset if you do not provider better source references.