rant-better's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 162449473 | 9 months ago | Hi Mateusz Konieczny, I added these changes on location and at the time I didn't know how to tag a Conveyancer. I had forgotten to get back to it and have know seen it is best to tag it as a law office. I will fix this up now. Thanks for your message. |
| 165093617 | 9 months ago | Thanks aharvey. If not a huge deal, I'll leave the borders as is, I don't really want to touch the big things like that until I have more experience. Cheers |
| 158643899 | about 1 year ago | Hi Ali, did you delete some buildings around here? The Bing Aerial map is out of date and this whole block is pretty filled out with apartments now. |
| 157108492 | over 1 year ago | Hi tastrax, thanks for the comment. I'll make sure to use the proper format going forward. Cheers |
| 157125295 | over 1 year ago | I did remove the addresses from the buildings, as I thought it might double up with the business one. Makes sense to have both. I'll put them back on. Thanks for the comments. |
| 157109361 | over 1 year ago | Have a look at the houses around Footscray, that's what I was going off mostly. That would be great if you could ask the Oceania community. Would be good to settle on a standard to use, I'm fine either way. |
| 157123591 | over 1 year ago | cheers |
| 157125295 | over 1 year ago | Hi realeatham. I moved the businesses to a node instead of the building as I thought best practice was to have businesses on nodes instead of buildings unless the building is significant itself. For example it will now shows as a Vietnamese Restaurant called Hao Phong instead of a building called Hao Phong on OrganicMaps. I guess this comes back to what you mentioned on the Brunswick edits. Do you think the standard is the put all information on the buildings instead of nodes? What if there are multiple businesses in the same building? Happy to adjust to fit what is common practice in Melbourne. |
| 157118104 | over 1 year ago | As I filled in the buildings and addresses I was shortening the address interpolation line since it wasn't needed for parts that have individual addresses. 230 was attached to the line so I removed it and replaced it with it's own address marker. |
| 157109361 | over 1 year ago | Hi realetham. Thanks for the comment. I spent some time reading up on the best practice for where to put address information (buildings vs points/nodes) and the conclusion I found was that both are acceptable but points/nodes were slightly more favoured. Maybe that was just a USA centered opinion though. I will look around Melbourne more and see what is the most common practice is and edit. |