Logotip de l'OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Conjunt de canvis Quan Comentari
177539545 fa 11 dies

Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions. Two points: please use meaningful changeset comments as per osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments and please include the country code in phone numbers as per phone=*

176864709 fa 27 dies

Please do not delete an item just to re-add it with minor edits as it loses the history. Rather edit the original
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176864709

175440178 fa 2 mesos aproximadament

What do you mean by surface=3? Also this way is not connected to anything at it's Eastern end, this is topologically incorrect and means it is not useful to routers.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175440178

172512002 fa 2 mesos

No exit is a hint to routers, the JOSM validator warns when not added. Connecting highways to areas such as buildings without a node tagged as an exit is also considered bad practice and the JOSM validator will warn for such usage. Validators are not to be blindly followed but in this case I believe the flags are valid.

174218725 fa 3 mesos

You also added the house number to the road itself - fixed
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174218725

173474249 fa 3 mesos

You have missed tagging layer=-1 to this an the other tunnel speed cameras you added
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173474249

172948409 fa 4 mesos

Review as requested: way/1436136343 is crossing multiple buildings and does not match the bing imagery that you listed as the source
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172948409

172594321 fa 4 mesos

I think the shop tag is also wrong, shop=supermarket seems wrong
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172594321

171442530 fa 5 mesos

These are not residential roads - they are driveways
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171442530

171442885 fa 5 mesos

These are not residential roads - they are driveways
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171442885

171337411 fa 5 mesos

Personal identifying information does not belong in OSM. Additionally the information appears to be fake
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171337411

171337115 fa 5 mesos

You previously added this McDonalds and it was removed as fantasy mapping after you didn't answer questions on that changeset. It still does not appear at https://mcdonalds.co.nz/find-us/restaurants and in aerial imagery looks to be a residential property. Additionally your changeset comment is non-sensical. Is this a genuine McDonalds?

169542645 fa 5 mesos

Thank you for addressing this.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169542645

171001802 fa 5 mesos

Do these trees you are adding really have an name? It appears as if you are adding a generic "Pohon" (which I understand to be a translation of tree) to every tree. This is not correct or needed, see osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171001802

170809378 fa 5 mesos

Additionally some tags have been updated an not others (check_date; contact:*; email; mobile etc) which make this POI a weird combination of two businesses
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809378

169644353 fa 6 mesos

Please do not use GSV as a source for OSM edits - it is expressly forbidden in their terms of service, see osm.wiki/Google
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169644353

169892054 fa 6 mesos

The correct way to tag a destroyed building is to use a life cycle prefix (see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay) instead of tagging as an area. Also please don't change the name to a description: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169892054

169584545 fa 6 mesos

Can you please advise what the source is for these peaks you are adding? Your changesets just list LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery and the peaks seem to not match the LINZ Height Point data from April 2025

169542645 fa 6 mesos

Many of the names you added: "Staff Only", "Concrete Pad" etc do not appear to be actual names (as per osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Please use access/descriptions tags etc instead
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169542645

169584122 fa 6 mesos

Why are you tagging latitude and longitude? They are implicit and do not need to be tagged: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:longitude
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169584122