ralley's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175440178 | 15 days ago | What do you mean by surface=3? Also this way is not connected to anything at it's Eastern end, this is topologically incorrect and means it is not useful to routers.
|
| 172512002 | 23 days ago | No exit is a hint to routers, the JOSM validator warns when not added. Connecting highways to areas such as buildings without a node tagged as an exit is also considered bad practice and the JOSM validator will warn for such usage. Validators are not to be blindly followed but in this case I believe the flags are valid. |
| 174218725 | about 1 month ago | You also added the house number to the road itself - fixed
|
| 173474249 | about 2 months ago | You have missed tagging layer=-1 to this an the other tunnel speed cameras you added
|
| 172948409 | 2 months ago | Review as requested: way/1436136343 is crossing multiple buildings and does not match the bing imagery that you listed as the source
|
| 172594321 | 3 months ago | I think the shop tag is also wrong, shop=supermarket seems wrong
|
| 171442530 | 3 months ago | These are not residential roads - they are driveways
|
| 171442885 | 3 months ago | These are not residential roads - they are driveways
|
| 171337411 | 4 months ago | Personal identifying information does not belong in OSM. Additionally the information appears to be fake
|
| 171337115 | 4 months ago | You previously added this McDonalds and it was removed as fantasy mapping after you didn't answer questions on that changeset. It still does not appear at https://mcdonalds.co.nz/find-us/restaurants and in aerial imagery looks to be a residential property. Additionally your changeset comment is non-sensical. Is this a genuine McDonalds? |
| 169542645 | 4 months ago | Thank you for addressing this.
|
| 171001802 | 4 months ago | Do these trees you are adding really have an name? It appears as if you are adding a generic "Pohon" (which I understand to be a translation of tree) to every tree. This is not correct or needed, see osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
|
| 170809378 | 4 months ago | Additionally some tags have been updated an not others (check_date; contact:*; email; mobile etc) which make this POI a weird combination of two businesses
|
| 169644353 | 4 months ago | Please do not use GSV as a source for OSM edits - it is expressly forbidden in their terms of service, see osm.wiki/Google
|
| 169892054 | 5 months ago | The correct way to tag a destroyed building is to use a life cycle prefix (see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay) instead of tagging as an area. Also please don't change the name to a description: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
|
| 169584545 | 5 months ago | Can you please advise what the source is for these peaks you are adding? Your changesets just list LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery and the peaks seem to not match the LINZ Height Point data from April 2025 |
| 169542645 | 5 months ago | Many of the names you added: "Staff Only", "Concrete Pad" etc do not appear to be actual names (as per osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Please use access/descriptions tags etc instead
|
| 169584122 | 5 months ago | Why are you tagging latitude and longitude? They are implicit and do not need to be tagged: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:longitude
|
| 169371996 | 5 months ago | Have you edited the correct building? This is 399 not 59 |
| 169367985 | 5 months ago | Why have you changed the building name? As seen in https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1028780289213963 the building is named "Pasadena Buildings" (and certainly not "=" which you changed it to) |