OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
180871595

Source was actually local knowledge; LINZ Aerial Imagery

180573472

You have created 2 churches within a few metres of each other.

180539851

Please do not remove paths just because they are informal - this was correctly tagged as informal, not visible and surface=grass. It is definitely navigable as can be seen from the Mapillary imagery
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180539851

180382217

What is your source for the name here? I don't remember any signage
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180382217

180383341

Please don't tag descriptions in the name field, it is for proper names only: osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180380595
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180383341

180380595

Please don't tag descriptions in the name field, it is for proper names only: osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180380595

180001400

Changing the name is not the correct way to handle stages of decay please look in to life cycle prefixes on the OSM wiki
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180001400

179737095

You appear to be tagging "Hills Hoist" washing lines as carpet hangers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179737095

179914617

This changeset appears to just be fantasy mapping/vandalism
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179914617

179886909

Please do not add a generic name to every object, the name field is for proper names only
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179886909

179858240

Additionally you created a park where one already was mapped an used the incorrect generic name "Park"
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179858240

179886519

You have also changed a bus stop to a cafe, leaving some of the bus stop tags amongst other errors.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179886519

179556695

The name field is for real names only, not descriptions like "New houses are being built". Also building=house is for individual houses not a development area of multiple houses
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179556695

179561665

You have connected the driveway to the footpath to the road which means it is unusable for vehicle routing
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179561665

179558815

You have changed the name and website but left the email, phone and operator unchanged, are these still correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179558815

179554144

What were you trying to accomplish here? You have changed a city to a restaurant
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179554144

179014992

Additionally these outlines are close to but not quite square whereas most buildings in NZ have largely 90 degree corners. Please use the Square option (short cut S) in the ID editor
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179014992

179014992

Additiomnally these outlines are close to but not quite square whereas most buildings in NZ have largely 90 degree corners. Please use the Square option (short cut S) in the ID editor
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179014992

179014992

Additiomnally these outlines are close to but not quite square whereas most buildings in NZ have largely 90 degree corners. Please use the Square option (short cut S) in the ID editor
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179014992

178842087

Please use changeset comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments