Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, looks good except please don't use the name field for generic names like "house" it is reserved for proer names only osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things. In this case replacing building=yes with building=house would be appropriate building=house
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128018642

Abovencomment wrongly made to V3 instead of V4
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86095890

Do you have a source for your change? The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127023930

Do you have a source for your change? The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86095890

Please do not use the name tag to mark life cycle stages - it is for proper names only. Please see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix instead
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125385141

Instead of adding POI's you edited existing suburb entries and changed them from suburbs to places of worship, this is not the correct way to edit
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124880453

Your edit has resulted in overlapping buildings. Is the building itself really named "Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd" or is this merely one of the businesses contained within?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124663902

Your description mentions yellow pages but you seem to have added no applicable tags, I would expect a name= and something like office= based on the description
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124702925

Thanks for the edits. One thing, please use ITU format for phone numbers: phone=*#Usage I've corrected this one.

Please don't edit the name to include the branch details, instead the branch should be put in a separate branch tag: branch=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124322224

Please don't edit the name to include the branch details, instead the branch should be put in a separate branch tag: branch=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124322224

Would this not be better tagged as amenity=clinic instead of amenity=hospital?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123581257

It appears as if you are making changes made my local editors with local knowledge based on outdated LINZ aerial imagery. The Innovation Complex construction (way/226696411) that you have deleted was added in 2021 by a local mapper and matches the latest Maxar Imagery. You have also added a non-existant walkway (local knowedge) and tagged an entire car park as consisting of disabled spaces. Multiple NZ changesets of yours have been commented on with no response. Please respond.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122658537

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, however this is a driveway and not a residential road
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122598603

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. The ways you are adding appear to be driveways and not residential roads and should be tagged as highway=service and service=driveway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122599802

Birdwood Road does have a sidewalk on one side, visible in mapillary imagery: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-36.859739720556&lng=174.59459203278&z=17&pKey=506922997332088&focus=photo
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122391833

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One thing, please don't use the name field to tag descriptions like "Driveway of Budden Road" osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122329187

Thank you for coming back and resolving.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122015553

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - just a point of caution you have tagged node/9208508589 as a tree but it is part of the building way/997267243. The tree should be added as a separate node instead.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122015553

This edit has dragged the address node for 90 Beach Road onto Castor Bay Road
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121232597