ralley's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 77651368 | about 6 years ago | Please don't put descriptions like "Morningside Reserve Path" in the name field unless it is in common use/sign posted. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
|
| 77308215 | about 6 years ago | All vandalism reverted |
| 77476487 | about 6 years ago | Changed to playground |
| 77497799 | about 6 years ago | Welcome to OSM and thanks for you edits. One thing to note, please don't use the name field for descriptions like "Public Walkthrough", see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
|
| 77490541 | about 6 years ago | This changeset has introduced a duplicate bus stop. Also the exisiting bus stop does have the number - it is in the ref field which I believe is the correct way to tag this. I will remove your new poi. Please feel free to modify the existing bus stop if you think it still needs changing. Thanks, Rob. |
| 77476487 | about 6 years ago | Typo? Isn't way/749133111 a playground rather than a quarry?
|
| 77473071 | about 6 years ago | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. I see you tried to correct the vandalism of the school name. Rather than creating a new node the brst solution was to edit the exisiting node. I've mreged your fix with the exisiting node so it should all be good now. Thanks, Rob.
|
| 77308215 | about 6 years ago | Please do not rename objects with personal names and add fake parks. |
| 77445267 | about 6 years ago | Please don't put descriptions such as "Self Contained" in the name field (see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only). Also your new node node/7003130893 is very close to node/6204386885. Are they distinct entities or do the refer to the same place? |
| 77352979 | about 6 years ago | The toilet and campsite added both turned out to be duplicates (maps.me is frequently outdated) - I've merged them with the existing objects
|
| 77352979 | about 6 years ago | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, just one thing, please don't put descriptions like "Freedom Camping" in the name field. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only. Thanks.
|
| 77253048 | about 6 years ago | Review as requested: Youve tagged two buildings as being number 9 neither of which appear to be the main building. Normally just one building gets tagged with the street number etc or just a node is place for the property as a whole (as was already the case here) |
| 77265691 | about 6 years ago | Can note/1948111 be actioned now? |
| 77044811 | about 6 years ago | Removed description from name field |
| 77044739 | about 6 years ago | Moved description |
| 77197667 | about 6 years ago | Review as requested: Building looks good to me. Only thing I can suggest is maybe bundle a bunch of buildings (say a blocks worth) into a single changeset.
|
| 77197667 | about 6 years ago | Review as requested: Building looks good to me. Only thing I can suggest is maybe bundle a bunch of buildings (say a blocks worth) into a single changeset.
|
| 77044739 | about 6 years ago | Please don't use the name field for generic names like "Milking Shed". osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
|
| 77044811 | about 6 years ago | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. One thing, please don't use the name key for generic descriptions like "Native Forest". See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
|
| 77044811 | about 6 years ago | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. One thing, please don't use the name key for generic descriptions like "Native Forest". See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
|