It looks like you've changed the tagging on these to access=permissive and vehicle=no. To mark they are closed I think you should tag them access=no and remove the foot= and vehicle= tags.

There is already a node with the address tags for number 22, you could just merge that with the building outline rather than adding a second number 22.

This changeset looks to be adding fantasy details, please revert to only include genuine features that are verifiable on the ground

From aerial imagery this appears to be a pool not a pond

This area you have tagged is a school not a water feature, please revert your change and use descriptive changeset comments

I cleaned up a multipolygon error identified by JOSM and merged the two outer ways, think it's all good now.

Awesome, thanks

Thanks for cleaning that up, can note note/1514030 now be resolved?

Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. I see you've tagged Z Pier Westhaven as a campsite - shouldn't this be caravan site? (ie. motor-home parking). Also can you please put descriptions in your changesets. Thanks.

Confirmed via visit 16-Nov-2018 no chimney here, removed.

As part of this edit you have added a chimney at 10 Ross Reid Place, East Tamaki. Are you sure about this? I've never seen it. Also it looks like you are putting personal details in the name tag - this should just be used for the common name.

Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. A couple of minor points, as per amenity=post_box post boxes should use amenity=post_box. Also the name tag shouldn't be used for a generic name like this.

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Just a couple of minor issues: the name tag should not be used to hold address information; when drawing the building you could have just replaced the geometry for the existing address node so it doesn't end up as a duplicate. If you want to discuss any aspects of OSM in NZ please check out https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nzopengis or https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz (they are both pretty quiet at the moment)

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, as per your review request it looks good to me. If you want to discuss any aspects of OSM in NZ please check out https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nzopengis or https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz (they are both pretty quiet at the moment)

Hi Andy, you can try https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nzopengis or https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz if you are looking for helpers but both are very quiet.

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, as per your review request it looks good to me. Please feel free to join the NZ OSM community discussions at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nzopengis or on the Talk-NZ mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz. Both are pretty quiet right now.

This changeset looks to have some problems: 1) the footpath is not connected to Chapel Road at the Western end; 2) The crossings with Quattro Avenue etc do not have nodes. Both of these will result in routing issues. 1) would normally result in a warning in JOSM (at least it does for me)

Title is wrong, this was Owairaka Domaina details

This changeset seems to have tagged the entire length of the river as being a culvert, did you just mean to tag a section?

Hi Nick, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. What do the two ways you have added represent? They have a name but no other key/values set to identify them.