OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
58161788 over 7 years ago

This looks (compared to LINZ Topo maps, available as a background in the iD editor) to be in the wrong place. There is an older peak for Mount Nicholas to the NE that looks to be in more correct location (but has no elevation). Additionally Mount should be spelled out instead of abbreviated. Also can you add a source for your changesets and use a descriptive changeset comment (not just your name)? Thanks.

49432893 over 7 years ago

Sounds good, cheers.

49432893 over 7 years ago

This actually seems wrong to me - it should also be tagged cycle=yes. As it stands it is now a walking only path.

58099848 over 7 years ago

Why have you changed the morotcross raceways to be tagged as motorways?

Also as previously requested can you please use meaningful changeset comments as per osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

58100453 over 7 years ago

Actually Matarau

57201893 over 7 years ago

Have you reported this user to the DWG? They seem to be consistently adding changes Id'd as vandalism under useless commit messages and don't respond to communication.

56955421 almost 8 years ago

Can you please use proper comments on your changesets - 'S' is not descriptive.

This change appears wrong - you have roads short cutting around the roundabout and going through houses.

52500195 almost 8 years ago

I see you've changed the skatepark to be tagged as a playground. As per sport=skateboard I believe the previous leisure=pitch was correct

56863812 almost 8 years ago

Accidentally committed via import account, should have been under account 'ralley'

56685379 almost 8 years ago

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, they look good to me.

You could look at deleting the previous address node for 18 March Place now that you have put the address on the building. Also you could connect the parking lot to March Place with a service way.

To follow the NZ OSM community you can look at talk-nz (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz just created and very quiet) or it's predecessor at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nzopengis

55798908 almost 8 years ago

If they are used by cars then they shouldn't be tagged as paths - they are probably service roads. They definitely should not intersect building and need to be joined to the adjacent roads

56256008 almost 8 years ago

Reviewed against LINZ and ESRI imagery and looks good

47859763 almost 8 years ago

I can confirm there is a playground here, visited in 2017.

55873711 almost 8 years ago

No additional paths needed, just move the end nodes of the existing paths so they are also part of the roads.

55798908 almost 8 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. It looks like the paths you added need a bit of clean up:
1) Some of them appear to be service roads and not paths
2) They are crossing buildings
3) Not connected to the roads

55873711 almost 8 years ago

These paths look like they should be connected to the nearby roads - as they stand they cannot be used for routing.

55759735 almost 8 years ago

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA

55764311 almost 8 years ago

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA

55818583 almost 8 years ago

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA

55818626 almost 8 years ago

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA