Salut Jean-Louis,

J'ai remplacé le tag "non standard" photo:flickr=* par… flickr=*

Amicalement,

—
Yves

PS: I forgot :

"flickr album" is not a "valid" key as no applications use it.

Hi mountain biker :)

For way/393471099 you could use flickr=https://www.flickr.com/photos/mtbboy1993/sets/72157685738509754/ to add a link to the album.

If you want both link to the picture and the album, use image=https://www.flickr.com/photos/mtbboy1993/36875315305 for the picture.

Note: the album is accessible by the picture.

Best regards,

Hi,

For Lowman Building (Way: 184253480), you could use wikimedia_commons=Category:Lowman Building to show current and past pictures.

So you could avoid unusable keys such image:old or image:flickr.

To link to a Flickr image, please use flickr=http://www.flickr.com/photos/70442209@N00/8251083193

Best regards

Add a well known tag saying that this node is a toilet:

* amenity=toilets

(I see that now you use this tag, thanks 😀)

Avoid proprietary tags.
I see that now you use description 😀

In the description I read "Site Owner: Private "
You could use the standard tags:
* owner=xxxx
* access=private
See [access](access=*?uselang=en) in the wiki.

* picture=Nil
* not useful → delete it

If you upload picture on internet, mapillary or wikimedia, use one of the following keys:
* image=http://server.domaine/path/to/the/image
* mapillary=xyz
* wikimedia_commons=File:name of the image

Best regards,
_
Yves

Hi,

Some of your OSM objects use the local:picture key that is "unusual" ;-)

Could you upload them and use the image or wikimedia_commons keys ?
Or remove theses tags ?

In the second case, you could use the OSM ID in the local filename or in a tag to link your local photo to the OSM object on your map...

Best regards,
_
Yves

PS: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/O0G

Bonjour,

Pour info j'ai corrigé/nettoyé les clés image, image_2, mapillary et subject:wikipedia pour la plaque de Rue du Maréchal Soult

Cordialement,
—
Yves

Hi Peter,

I fixed picture, wikipedia_1 and wikipedia_2 tags ;-)

BR,
Yves

Your right. I click to fast on the upload button.

(I split my previous and next uploads by countries)

BR,

—
Yves

Not kill, just "merge" with wikimedia_commons.

Nothing "wrong".
As the url in this image tag link to a wikimedia file, wikimedia_commons tags is more appropriate.
(And the value is shorter).

Note: this wikimedia_commons syntax specify a Category and a File (so that's why I removed image key).

Hallo Jo,
I repaired wikimedia_commons values according to wikimedia_commons=*
Values MUST start with File: or Category: to let software to display images.

Best regards,
—
Yves

PS: I do that all over the world

done

Hi,
These tags came from the import (S-57 data) and must be deleted.
I will do this later.
Thanks Jan for your message.
Yves

> That's an osmose issue
+1

> he tower and the lighthouse are one single building,
>I think there should be a relation as you've created a building in another building.

I tried to do that, with all the tags on the relation, except ref:FR:ANFR and seamark:* on the tower.
But I wasn't satisfied.

If you have a good solution, you're welcome

BR

height is kept on the tower itself (way/737281110)

source value was obsolete. The source used is on the changeset.

ref ? Do you mean seamark:light:reference ?

According Malcolm, seamark:light:reference is deprecated.

I get and clean the value and store it in ref:admiralty
I also use other references:
ref:nga
ref:uscg in USA
ref:aladin, ref:shom in France…

BR,

Buongiorno Tomi,

The lighthouse already exist : node/336628434

I will merge the 2 lighthouses...

BR,
__
Yves

You could see it on OpenSeaMap with it AIS position :
http://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=18&lat=37.48879&lon=15.08484&layers=BFTFFFFFFTF0TFFFFFFFFF

Or on Marine Traffic:
https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:15.085/centery:37.489/zoom:19

Merci :)

Zut, on a oublié de supprimer la source IGN.
En regardant l'historique, ça vient de "US NGA Pub. 113. 2010-10-22."

MMSI source is https://www.marinetraffic.com for AIS beacons outside France
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74919919

Salut Adrien,

J'ai corrigé le nom "Birvideaux" et rajouté les MMSI des émetteurs AIS (source: https://maritime-eadministration.anfr.fr/internet-search-navire)

Pour le Phare des Birvideaux, il y a deux noeuds (le repère géodésique, et le phare lui même, à moins que ce soit le phare et une bouée. Les 2 points sont distants de 40 cm !!).

Je préfère garder le repère sans les tags maritimes et garder les seamark: sur le "phare" qu'on peut déplacer sans toucher au repère.

Ils ont des valeurs différentes (cf. infra).
Je te laisse vérifier ce qui est bon.

Merci,

—
Yves
seamark:light:range=10
seamark:light:range=24
seamark:light:colour=white
seamark:light:reference=D 1014
seamark:light:sequence=1+(1)+1+(3)
seamark:topmark:colour=black
seamark:topmark:shape=2 spheres