"Hi Farras,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way/180326895
classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential' till node/1907595262.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."

"Hi Dary IRM-ED,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way/681004182 classified as 'Track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential' as it is leading to destinations ahead.

Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."

"Hi Bayu Adi Styawan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way/300926941 classified as 'Primary Highway'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Trunk link'.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."

Hi Elisabeth IRM-ED

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the nodes 3123659407 and node/3123659404 classified as "residential". However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be "service"

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.

"""Hi Yurasi,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across

way/461138812 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance."""

"""Hi Teesta,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across

way/658682382 classified as 'Unclassified' is ending on residential. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this should not happen'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance."""

"""Hi Hajid Naufal,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across

way/458264954 classified as 'Unclassified' is ending on residential. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this should not happen'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance."""

"""Hi Alex Rollin,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the""way/166666541,way 166666539,way 166666525"" classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to a residential area .

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."""

"""Hi restudyah,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/497530133 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to a residential area .

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."""

"""Hi pujisilalahi,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across theway 508198181,way 647266239,way 647266240 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to a residential area and also we can see that there is a connectivity as well.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."""

Hi karitotp,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/672256820 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'.

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.

"Hi HEN TAM,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/480601510 classified as 'teritiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'unclassified' as it is leading to inconsistency.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."

"Hi armasari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/447137926 classified as 'primary' which is ending on teritiary as it is incorrect as high priority will never end on low prioitiy.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."

"Hi Aulia Ishmata,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/480606072 classified as 'teritiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to dead end.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."

"Hi Aulia Ishmata,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the v classified as 'teritiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to dead end.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."

"Hi Aulia Ishmata,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/480601506,way 480601508 classified as 'teritiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to dead end.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."

"Hi aisah,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/437489502,way 437490457 classified as 'unclassied'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as unclassified cannot be left hanging.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."

"Hi aisah,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/437489954 classified as 'unclassied'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to inconsistency.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."

"Hi adiatmad,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/437489170 classified as 'teritiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'unclassified' as it is abruptly ending on the unclassified.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."

"Hi adiatmad,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/511618252 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to a residential area and also we can see that there is a connectivity as well.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."