OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
87819918 over 3 years ago

Hi Jerry,
Thanks for bringing this up. Apologies for the genuine mistake from my side and I will make sure that this will not be repeated going forward. I have added segment based on latest aerial imagery i.e. Esri clarity beta. i have delete the segment based on your suggestion. Here is the changeset (120153717)
Thanks again. Happy to learn from you.
Best Regards,
priymose.

107480394 over 4 years ago

Hi ndm,
I have used Bing aerial imagery to make the edit as it was the most aligned imagery. Thanks for correcting the geometry.
Regards,
priymose.

107295871 over 4 years ago

Hello,
Sorry for the inconvenience. I have now changed the highway classification to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (107475798) with changes made. Regards,
priymose.

107292644 over 4 years ago

Hi SafetyIng,
Thanks for the feedback. I have now changed the road class to driveway as per your suggestion. Please look into the changeset (107475676) with modifications.
Regards,
priymose.

107313637 over 4 years ago

Hello SafetyIng,
Thanks for the feedback. I have tagged the driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset(107475525) for the changes made.
Regards,
priymose.

107311957 over 4 years ago

Hello SafetyIng,
I have now changed the highway tag to driveway as suggested. Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset (107475402) with suggested modifications. Good day!
Regards,
priymose.

107311492 over 4 years ago

Hello SafetyIng,
Thanks for checking into my edits. Apologies for the genuine miss from my end. I have now changed the classification to driveway. Happy to learn from you!
Regards,
priymose.

107311809 over 4 years ago

Hello SafetyIng, 
Apologies for misinterpreting the driveway. I have made the changes as per your suggestion. Happy to learn from you!
Regards,
priymose.

107309422 over 4 years ago

Hello SafetyIng,
I have now changed the highway tag to driveway as suggested. Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset (107424375) with suggested modifications. Good day!
Regards,
priymose.

106945894 over 4 years ago

Hello SafetyIng,
Apologies for this genuine miss from my end. I have now added service=parking_aisle as per your suggestion. Thanks for looking into my edits. Happy to learn from you.
Regards,
priymose

106882879 over 4 years ago

Hi,Apologies for the misinterpretation. I have modified the tags as per your suggestion. Regards, priymose

104967286 over 4 years ago

Hi,
Thanks for checking my edits.I have adjusted the building feature based on Esri world imagery as the neighboring features look aligned as per the same. Apologies for the miss from my end on adjustment of the symmetry. I have made the modifications as per your suggestion by using the Offset of (2.57,0) and NRW Ortho Imagery. Please find the changeset (105072473) for your reference. Please feel-free to suggest any modifications we are always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
priymose

88921969 over 4 years ago

Hi Skyper,
Thanks for checking my edit and providing your valuable feedback. I have misinterpreted the segment and gate based on obstruction visible on Maxar imagery. I genuinely apologize for the miss from our end. I have modified the geometry as per Bing aerial imagery, removed gate and private access as there is no proper evidence. I will make sure to take this learning in my future edits and verify all the available resources. Please find the changeset(104971866) of the same.
Thanks

95404996 almost 5 years ago

thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, i have misinterpreted and created a service road. thanks for the quick correction. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to avoid such edits in future. always happy to learn from the community

95222856 about 5 years ago

Hi Phil,
I have added the service road but did not add any access as there is no overlays or gate present to confirm the access. But, yes as rightly said by you it is leading to school and also all the other roads added are tagged private. Hence, it makes complete sense to add private access. I have made the edit as per your suggestion- Changeset:9542495 . Always Happy to learn from the community.
Regards.

95293038 about 5 years ago

Hi Holger,
Thanks for looking into our edits. I Apologise for the miss from my end. I have added the service road as it is leading to multiple entities but missed verifying the pavement and the type. Thanks for the correcting my edits. Yes, as you have mention the right entry should be through the service road that you have added. Always happy to learn from community.
Regards,priymose

78184388 about 5 years ago

Hi SomeoneElse,
looks like i have used offset feature to trace the road but missed checking the vicinity and setting the offset perfectly. Thanks for looking into my edit. will implement this learning in my future edits.

91364486 over 5 years ago

thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have mistakenly modified the access tag. thanks for the heads-up, please find the changeset/714999114 for the reverted edits. going forward, i will make sure to perform the edits much more carefully. always happy to learn from the community"

84339220 over 5 years ago

Thanks for your time for checking into our edits. We have created the service road based on the available resources and unable to validate the stream with our resources. We are not sure of making edits without supporting ground data. Please find the changest() for the suggested modifications. Do let us know that if we can go ahead and add the bridge in our future edits based on the existing streams. always happy to learn from the community

81968555 almost 6 years ago

Hi ndm,
Thanks for making changes to the edit. I have used a different imagery while making the edit. I will consider this and will follow the same going forward while making such edit. Always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
priymose.