OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
43283630 over 6 years ago

"Hi Bayu Adi Styawan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across these ways:

way/450214709
way/705032309
way/450214711
way/142792781

where in configuration also does not seem to match the ground reality and can be changed as per this screenshot:https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-HvgzX78mwzo/XS61XvrWgFI/AAAAAAAAAYU/vxD5UPGTuA4ydG10jLN5wsSupVBwgbkXwCK8BGAs/s0/2019-07-16.png

Please suggest if it is otherwise.

Thanks in advance."

64659626 over 6 years ago

Hi JaLooNz,

Thanks for your time in sharing the feedback.

The service roads in this area are created by user "geoJenn" on 23/10/17 with source
mentioned as DigitalGlobe 2017-06-30.

https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/53186796/?filters=%7B%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%2C%22ids%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%2253186796%22%2C%22value%22%3A%2253186796%22%7D%5D%7D.

Thanks,
priyaboya.

34184736 over 6 years ago

"Hi Bayu Adi Styawan,

Trust you are well.

While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way/371909894 and way/371909895 classified as 'secondary'.However, going by the aerial imagery,none of the imagery is supporting for these link segments as we did not find physical median supporting for this from any of the resources.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance."

68325122 over 6 years ago

"Hi Aglis IRM-ED,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way/678318335,way 456175139,way 456175143 and way/456175145 classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'service'.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."

67459852 over 6 years ago

Hi Adiatma IRM-RV,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/491094619 classified as 'tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance.

48221835 over 6 years ago

Hi Randy Febri Nanda,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/31507425 and way/490060503 as 'Tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'
As of now correcting the data.Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.

47430637 over 6 years ago

Hi Fadlilaa,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/29093166 as 'Tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'
As of now correcting the data.Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.

55539654 almost 7 years ago

Hi Saputra deo,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way/326732298 and way/553897519 classified as 'Residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Unclassified'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance.