priyaboya's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 43283630 | over 6 years ago | "Hi Bayu Adi Styawan, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across these ways: way/450214709
where in configuration also does not seem to match the ground reality and can be changed as per this screenshot:https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-HvgzX78mwzo/XS61XvrWgFI/AAAAAAAAAYU/vxD5UPGTuA4ydG10jLN5wsSupVBwgbkXwCK8BGAs/s0/2019-07-16.png Please suggest if it is otherwise. Thanks in advance." |
| 64659626 | over 6 years ago | Hi JaLooNz, Thanks for your time in sharing the feedback. The service roads in this area are created by user "geoJenn" on 23/10/17 with source
Thanks,
|
| 34184736 | over 6 years ago | "Hi Bayu Adi Styawan, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way/371909894 and way/371909895 classified as 'secondary'.However, going by the aerial imagery,none of the imagery is supporting for these link segments as we did not find physical median supporting for this from any of the resources. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |
| 68325122 | over 6 years ago | "Hi Aglis IRM-ED, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way/678318335,way 456175139,way 456175143 and way/456175145 classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'service'.
Thanks in advance." |
| 67459852 | over 6 years ago | Hi Adiatma IRM-RV, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/491094619 classified as 'tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance. |
| 48221835 | over 6 years ago | Hi Randy Febri Nanda, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/31507425 and way/490060503 as 'Tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'
Thanks in advance. |
| 47430637 | over 6 years ago | Hi Fadlilaa, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/29093166 as 'Tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'
Thanks in advance. |
| 55539654 | almost 7 years ago | Hi Saputra deo, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way/326732298 and way/553897519 classified as 'Residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Unclassified'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance. |