I've rejoined some ways that shouldn't have been split because there was no need for them to be split.

Hello,

A user is claiming that the loop around Metchosin Mountain (e.g. way/276922437) is private access. I was wondering if you remembered anything from when you mapped it a few years ago.

Thanks,

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group

Hello,

A user is claiming that the loop around Metchosin Mountain (e.g. way/276922437) is private access. I was wondering if you remembered anything from when you mapped it a few years ago.

Thanks,

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group

Hello,

For some reason, you've created a huge changeset that spans from Africa to Asia. Was there anything odd that you were doing?

Also, I noticed that some buildings like way/532298735 are traced on top of other buildings, which is an error. Do you need help fixing these?

Hello,

Wit this upload you seem to have duplicated

changeset/52533184 changeset/52975466 changeset/52974598 changeset/52945321

Hello,

this changeset seems to have added non-English names as name:en, e.g. node/2897172697

Also, I can't see any information about the license of the data on wikiloc.com, just a (C) 老瓦 All rights reserved. Where's the license found?

You've misinterpreted that, that is about splitting the way at the intersection which is required, not splits like this.

All editors handle way splits correctly, and if any didn't, it would be an editor bug. I've rejoined the ways at 49th and Granville, could you handle any others?

I also saw that when you split stuff one way ended up in relations twice

Ways can't be too long for adding a restriction.

Hello,
I'm wondering why you split way/472477000 into its own way. I can't see any reason to do so, and any relations on it didn't need it split.

Do you mean relation/6951615? There's no reason to split the way to add that.

So it is an import?

Those terms are the license you've got the data under?

Hello,

I was looking for some information on this source. Is it an import?

Is the stream direction for way/527730240 right? As it goes along it gets smaller and smaller, I'd have thought it was flowing to the southwest.

Living streets here surprises me since they're normally used where there are traffic problems - are you sure they're not residential roads or service roads?

Hello,

You've made way/527727984 which overlaps with a footpath. Does the footpath need moving, or is the building wrong?

Hello,

I'm wondering why you split way/472477000 into its own way. I can't see any reason for it to be separate. There's also something odd around way/475859247 where the highway has been split lots.

node/4827349525 was tagged as a highway rest area in the middle of a residential area. The childcare with "Capilano rivet hatchery" as a name sounds odd too, are you sure about that?

Welcome to OpenStreetMap,

I just wanted to let you know that I've added an office=lawyer tag to the point you added, to indicate it's a lawyer's office, as well as a bit of clean-up on the address and description.

If you want to join in the local community, we keep in touch in a few ways. One is the Canada-wide mailing list at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca, and another is the monthly Vancouver OpenStreetMap meetup at https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Vancouver/

Is there any imagery which covers the new construction?