In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal

👍

Thank you for the clarification.

Please ensure the location is clearly verifiable on the ground (e.g., permanent signage) and tag it accordingly as an embarkation/meeting point if there is no office or shop present. If applicable, you may also add available payment methods.

Thanks.

PS: Could you please clarify where the company is physically based? The current node is located directly on a dock in the harbor. Is there an actual office or shop at this location?

PS: The bot's concern only relates to the description text, which was/is still spammy.

You did it already @Manos Roudas

See changeset/179164832

Hello,

Thank you for your reply.

To clarify, the issue is *not* the company name.

The concern only relates to the description text, which should be factual, concise, and non-promotional. OpenStreetMap is a neutral map database and does not allow marketing-style wording.

Please revise the description accordingly.

Thank you!

Thanks @Timmy_Tesseract

changeset/179158815

Spam

Spam

Thank you for clarifying.

Best regards,
On behalf of the NeisBot

Thanks @silversurfer83

Reverted by changeset/179140997

I used at least the wiki-page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andorra_la_Vella

Please stop!

Hello,

I noticed that you changed name:es from “Andorra la Vieja” to “Andorra la Vella.”

Could you please clarify the reason for this change? As far as I understand, name:es should reflect the Spanish-language name, and “Andorra la Vieja” has traditionally been the Spanish exonym.

If you have sources showing that “Andorra la Vella” is now preferred in Spanish usage, I’d be interested to see them.

Thanks in advance for the clarification.

https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/58957648

Can you explain what you're trying to accomplish here?

Can you explain what you're trying to accomplish here?

Please stop adding new data and respond to the changeset comments.

Thank you.

Please stop adding new data and respond to the changeset comments.

Thank you.

In my opinion, all changesets of this contributor should be reverted.