thanks a lot for this change (and the rest of your work around Wurzen)!
Because there is now a separate node for the free shop, I'd rather keep the opening hours only there (since the rest of Kanthaus is not more accessible during those hours)

Hey, herzlichem Dank dafür! Es freut mich sehr, dass ich nicht allein in dieser Aufgabe bin :)

Komisch, dass war natürlich nicht absichtlich! Ich habe keine Frage über Smoothness geantwortet. Entschuldigung, ich habe es zurückgesetzt.

Danke schön, das war schnell! :)

Macht Sinn, ich war auch selber nicht so sicher…

Concernant le nœud node/7368671692, est-ce la manière canonique d'indiquer un endroit où on peut se faire tester pour le coronavirus ? Je cherche des discussions à ce sujet sans grand succès…

C'est effectivement un problème, puisque l'attribut "place=city" rend ce point très visible. Je le supprime pour résoudre ce problème.

à propos de la déchetterie sur laquelle vous avez ajouté une note: way/173900228
Non, il n'y a plus aucune incinération sur place depuis des années: d'ailleurs ce n'est pas une décharge mais une déchetterie

Merci!

Hmm, c'est curieux - le calque devait être activé dans JOSM, sans être affiché évidemment !

Many thanks for this lightning-fast solution! Have a great day!

hi! thanks for this. The road you have traced actually goes further and connects to the main road up north (I have cycled there yesterday and realized that this road was not on the map). I have updated this.

thanks a lot!

that looks much better, thanks a lot!

thanks a lot! do you mind if I refine the shape of the road with my GPS traces?
I think it currently goes too far to the West: you have probably been mislead by the shape of the building which was wrong in the first place. See note/859639

Hi,
A one-way street now crosses the building you have drawn, from Oxpens road to Abbeyplace. I don't think the other street crossing the construction site is still running. See the note here:
note/859639
I think I need more surveying to be confident enough to fix this problem.

ok yeah, that's what happened: http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=3192282124
sorry about that!

Or it could be that the Wikidata ID was fixed before by someone else, but the wikidata-osm tool data was not updated so it still displayed the conflict…

The id I removed on the shipwreck was https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q478353 , which indeed refers to the replica in Amsterdam, not the actual shipwreck!

So my edit was correct :-) But thank you for checking!

If I'm not wrong the wikidata ID was that of its replica in Amsterdam, not the actual shipwreck… But I can't find the Wikidata ID I removed :-/. Anyway Q26674641 seems to be the right one, so let's add it.

For the Argos shop, it had wikidata ID https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q189901 , which is clearly wrong.