Hi Guido.
I fixed them. Thanks.

Regards.
Pilar.

Hi Kazeem
Thank you for your contribution on OSM, I notice you added more transformers and lines, is it correct?
Regards.
Pilar.

Ok, muchas gracias.
Saludos.

Hi carciofo.
Thank you for notifying us about this issue, My coworker Karito was fixed it in this changesets changeset/54027811.
Regards!

He encontrado otro caso similar de Taca changeset/25993254

Hola ovruni.
He visto que agregaste Uyuccasa como "Hamlet", pero hay otro usuario que agregó el mismo lugar como "village" changeset/32165678, por favor podrías validar cuál es correcto?.
Gracias.

Hi ioanam_telenav.
I noticed that you changed a case of `destination` to `destination:lanes`. Please, could you explain this change?

When you see this case only should add `destination=Auto Mall Parkway;Durham Road`, and when you see this case https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=mUDqicHyq4in0_OMpYYdkw&lat=47.586855249999985&lng=-122.32018249999999&z=17&x=0.5500177502731437&y=0.48693384534114265&zoom=0.3357972544878564 we should add these tags:
`destination=Dearborn Street;James Street;Madison Street;Spokane`
`destination:lanes=Dearborn Street;James Street;Madison Street|Spokane`
`destination:ref=I 90 East`
`destination:ref:lanes=|I 90 East`
`junction:ref=164A`

Regards.
Pilar.

Hi Iqhra
I noticed that you added no_left_turn (relation/7567651), but I think you confused, this TR not corresponding in this street.
Regards.
Pilar.

Hi TeresaPeteti.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added TR(no_left), I searched with Mapillary, OpenStreetCam, but I didn't find any image that indicated there is a no_left.
Could you please explain which image you used for add this TR?
Thank you.
Regards.
Pilar.

Hi Iqhra.
In this case you added TR(no_left), I searched with Mapillary, OpenStreetCam, but I didn't find any image tha indicated there is a no_left.
Could you please explain which image you used for add this TR?
Thank you.
Regards.
Pilar.

Hi GerdP.
You have the reason. Thank you for your feedback. I updated my changeset.
Regards.

Hi S-zation.
Thank you for your feedback. I will be more careful. I reverted my changeset.
Regards.

Hi jacksparrow.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you changed city for town in several changesets, I reviewed in wikipedia and in all cases they are cities, I don't understand why did you do the changes? Could you explain? thank you.
changeset/50396732
changeset/50396719
changeset/50396697
changeset/50396596

Regards.

Hi Oleg.
Yes, I changed the status of 3 areas, from "park" to "forest"; because in these areas, according the Bing imagery I saw only agglomerated trees and there aren't open space, for this reason I considered as a `forest`. Instead it should be considered as a `park` when there are more open spaces where people can walk, play (green area for recreation).

Regarding the comment, if you thought it was private and it was not private, there is no problem. Many times we make comments in the changes that are made to know the reason of the change, to learn and if maybe we had an error we can correct it thanks to the feedback. Don't worry.

Regards.

Hi dbaron.
Thank you for feedback.
I added a lot of parking aisle because I worked with Bing imagery, maybe you have local knowledge for you help me correct them. Please.
Regards.

Hi ethylisocyanat.
I was working on fixing highways which are islands by tracing or connecting them to another highway using #to-fix, I focused only in connecting of highways, but I reviewed about your commentary, so I saw my changesets and you have reason, it can not be "secondary", in this case it will to be a "residential", because the main highway is "tertiary". I updated this changesets.
Thank you.
Regards.

Hi apm-wa.
Thank you for the information. I will review.
Regards.

Hi rab.
Done!

Hi apm-wa.
I reviewed my changesets, I did that, because according the Bing image I saw a "meadow", for this reason I changed your edition. I will make sure to double check and add a note in case of doubts. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.

Hi YusufTuncay:
Please, can you review and confirm this mapping?, also here overlap for your mapping changeset/48604977.
Regards.